Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37561264›Full record

ArticleJapanese journal of radiology2024

Utility of machine learning for identifying stapes fixation on ultra-high-resolution CT.

Ruowei Tang, Jia Li, Pengfei Zhao, Zhengyu Zhang, Hongxia Yin, Heyu Ding, Ning Xu, Zhenghan Yang, Zhenchang Wang

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Japanese journal of radiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ruowei Tang *Department of Radiology, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, 95 Yong'an Road, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100050, People's Republic of China.
Jia Li *Department of Radiology, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, 95 Yong'an Road, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100050, People's Republic of China.
Pengfei ZhaoDepartment of Radiology, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, 95 Yong'an Road, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100050, People's Republic of China. zhaopengf05@163.com.
Zhengyu ZhangDepartment of Radiology, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, 95 Yong'an Road, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100050, People's Republic of China.
Hongxia YinDepartment of Radiology, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, 95 Yong'an Road, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100050, People's Republic of China.
Heyu DingDepartment of Radiology, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, 95 Yong'an Road, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100050, People's Republic of China.
Ning XuDepartment of Radiology, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, 95 Yong'an Road, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100050, People's Republic of China.
Zhenghan YangDepartment of Radiology, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, 95 Yong'an Road, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100050, People's Republic of China.
Zhenchang WangDepartment of Radiology, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, 95 Yong'an Road, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100050, People's Republic of China. cjr.wzhch@vip.163.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1944-7550
Capital Medical University · CN

Funding

Beijing Key Clinical Discipline Funding 2021-135Beijing Natural Science Foundation 7222301Beijing Scholar 2015 [2015] 160Capital's Funds for Health Improvement and Research 2022-1-1111National Natural Science Foundation of China 61931013National Natural Science Foundation of China 82171886
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeImaging diagnosis of stapes fixation (SF) is challenging owing to a lack of definite evidence. We developed a comprehensive machine learning (ML) model to identify SF on ultra-high-resolution CT. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe retrospectively enrolled 109 participants (143 ears) and divided them into the training set (115 ears) and test set (28 ears). Stapes mobility (SF or non-SF) was determined by surgical inspection. In the ML analysis, rectangular regions of interest were placed on consecutive axial slices in the training set. Radiomic features were extracted and fed into the training session. The test set was analyzed using 7 ML models (support vector machine, k nearest neighbor, decision tree, random forest, extra trees, eXtreme Gradient Boosting, and Light Gradient Boosting Machine) and by 2 dedicated neuroradiologists. Diagnostic performance (sensitivity, specificity and accuracy, with surgical findings as the reference) was compared between the radiologists and the optimal ML model by using the McNemar test.

resultsThe mean age of the participants was 42.3 ± 17.5 years. The Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LightGBM) model showed the highest sensitivity (0.83), specificity (0.81), accuracy (0.82) and area under the curve (0.88) for detecting SF among the 7 ML models. The neuroradiologists achieved good sensitivities (0.75 and 0.67), moderate-to-good specificities (0.63 and 0.56) and good accuracies (0.68 and 0.61). This model showed no statistical differences with the neuroradiologists (P values 0.289-1.000).

conclusionsCompared to the neuroradiologists, the LightGBM model achieved competitive diagnostic performance in identifying SF, and has the potential to be a supportive tool in clinical practice.

Indexed as

Machine LearningStapesAdultHumansMiddle AgedRadiologistsRetrospective StudiesTomography, X-Ray ComputedYoung AdultDiagnosis, computer-assistedImmobilizationMachine learningStapesTomography, X-ray computed

Identifiers

PMID37561264
OpenAlexW4385715885

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.