ArticleInternational ophthalmology2023
Impact of the junior doctors' industrial action on the emergency eye department in a large tertiary ophthalmic hospital: the Manchester experience.
Article in International ophthalmology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo assess the impact of the junior doctors' industrial action on one of the largest emergency eye departments (EED) in the United Kingdom.
methodsWe compared staff allocation, patient presentation, time in streaming, time in the department, the Manchester Triage System (MTS) score, number of eye emergencies and follow-up care of patients who attended the EED in the Manchester Royal Eye Hospital (MREH) during the 3-day industrial action (13-15 March 2023) compared with control periods 2 weeks before and 2 weeks after the industrial action.
resultsDuring the industrial action, there were almost 1.5 times more staff allocated to EED with a near doubling of the senior workforce. There was no difference in patient presentation, MTS score, number of eye emergencies or patient follow-up during the industrial action. However, patients had significantly less time in streaming (p < 0.001) and in the department (p < 0.001) during the industrial action compared to control periods.
conclusionEmergency ophthalmic patient care was not compromised during the industrial action due to the reallocation of the workforce to EED. The results of this study may help in the planning of ophthalmic eye-care services in the event of future industrial actions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
37561248What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.