Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37561196›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of pediatrics2023

Recruitment and retention challenges and strategies in randomized controlled trials of psychosocial interventions for children with cancer and their parents: a collective case study.

Anne van Driessche, Kim Beernaert, Luc Deliens, Marijke C Kars, Maureen E Lyon, Maru Barrera, Veronica Dussel, Pernille Bidstrup, Abby R Rosenberg, Terrah F Akard and 2 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of pediatrics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
5.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 8 institutions in 5 countries.

Anne van DriesscheEnd-of-Life Care Research Group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB) & Ghent University, Laarbeeklaan 103, 1090, Brussels, Belgium. Anne.van.Driessche@vub.be.
Kim BeernaertEnd-of-Life Care Research Group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB) & Ghent University, Laarbeeklaan 103, 1090, Brussels, Belgium.
Luc DeliensEnd-of-Life Care Research Group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB) & Ghent University, Laarbeeklaan 103, 1090, Brussels, Belgium.
Marijke C KarsCenter of Expertise Palliative Care Utrecht, Julius Center of Health and Primary Care, UMC Utrecht, Universiteitsweg 100, 3584, CG Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Maureen E LyonCenter for Translational Research, Children's National Hospital, 111 Michigan Avenue, Washington, NW, DC 20010-2970, USA.
Maru BarreraSickKids Hospital, Research Institute, Child Health and Evaluation Sciences, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Veronica DusselPediatric Palliative Care, Research Mass General for Children, Boston, USA.
Pernille BidstrupDanish Cancer Society Research Center, Psychological Aspects of Cancer, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Abby R RosenbergDepartment of Psychosocial Oncology and Palliative Care, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA.
Terrah F AkardGraduate School, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA.
Joachim CohenEnd-of-Life Care Research Group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB) & Ghent University, Laarbeeklaan 103, 1090, Brussels, Belgium.
Aline De VleminckEnd-of-Life Care Research Group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB) & Ghent University, Laarbeeklaan 103, 1090, Brussels, Belgium.
Ghent University · BEChildren's National · USDana-Farber Cancer Institute · USDanish Cancer Society · DKSickKids Foundation · CAUniversity Medical Center Utrecht · NLVanderbilt University · USVrije Universiteit Brussel · BE

Funding

Building Evidence for Effective Palliative/End of Life Care for Teens with CancerR01NR015458 · NINR · CHILDREN'S RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI LYON, MAUREEN ELLEN · 2015 to 2019
$3.4M
Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek G.0194.18 NKinderkankerfonds No grant numberNINR NIH HHS R01 NR015458
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In pediatric oncology there are few examples of successful recruitment and retention strategies in psychosocial care research. This study aims to summarize experiences, challenges, and strategies for conducting randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of psychosocial intervention studies among children with cancer and their parent(s). We conducted a collective case study. To identify the cases, Pubmed and two trial registries were searched for ongoing and finished RCTs of psychosocial intervention studies for children with cancer and their parents. Online semi-structured expert interviews discussing recruitment and retention challenges and strategies were performed with principal investigators and research staff members of the identified cases. Nine studies were identified. Investigators and staff from seven studies participated, highlighting challenges and strategies within three major themes: eligibility, enrollment and retention. Regarding eligibility, collaborating constructively with healthcare professionals and involving them before the start of the study were essential. Being flexible, training the research staff, enabling alignment with the participants' situation, and providing consistency in contact between the research staff member and the families were important strategies for optimizing enrollment and retention. All studies followed a stepped process in recruitment.  Conclusion: Although recruitment and retention in some selected studies were successful, there is a paucity of evidence on experienced recruitment and retention challenges in pediatric psychosocial research and best practices on optimizing them. The strategies outlined in this study can help researchers optimize their protocol and trial-implementation, and contribute to better psychosocial care for children with cancer and their parents.  Trial Registration: This study is not a clinical trial. What is Known: • Performing RCTs is challenging, particularly in pediatric psychosocial research when both the child and parent are targeted. Recruitment and retention are common concerns. In pediatric oncology, there are few examples of successful recruitment and retention strategies in psychosocial care research. What is New: • Key strategies to collaborate constructively with healthcare professionals were outlined. Being flexible, training the research staff, alignment with the participant's situations and providing consistency in contact between the research staff member and the families were considered as essential strategies.

Indexed as

NeoplasmsPsychosocial InterventionChildHumansParentsRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicResearch PersonnelIntervention studiesPediatric oncologyPsychosocial studiesRandomized controlled trialsRecruitmentRetention

Identifiers

PMID37561196
PMCPMC12690611
OpenAlexW4385716186

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.