Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37560762›Full record

ReviewAoB PLANTS2023

Leaf physiological and morphological constraints of water-use efficiency in C

Peter Petrík, Anja Petek-Petrik, Mohammad Mukarram, Bernhard Schuldt, Laurent J Lamarque

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in AoB PLANTS, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. The promise of resurrection plants in enhancing crop tolerance to water scarcity.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Variation in Leaf Functional Traits ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Response of stomatal density and size inEcology and evolution · 2024
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Peter PetríkKarlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Institute of Meteorology and Climate Research-Atmospheric Environmental Research (IMK-IFU), Kreuzeckbahnstraße 19, 82467 Garmisch-Partenkirchen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1092-3031
Anja Petek-PetrikInstitute of Botany, Czech Academy of Sciences, Lidická 971, 602 00 Brno, Czech Republic.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0463-5049
Mohammad MukarramDepartment of Phytology, Faculty of Forestry, Technical University in Zvolen, T.G. Masaryka 24, 960 01 Zvolen, Slovakia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9034-9366
Bernhard SchuldtChair of Forest Botany, Institute of Forest Botany and Forest Zoology, Technical University of Dresden (TUD), Pienner Str. 7, 01737 Tharandt, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4738-5289
Laurent J LamarqueDépartement des Sciences de l'environnement, Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières, Trois-Rivières, QC G8Z 4M3, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1430-5193

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The increasing evaporative demand due to climate change will significantly affect the balance of carbon assimilation and water losses of plants worldwide. The development of crop varieties with improved water-use efficiency (WUE) will be critical for adapting agricultural strategies under predicted future climates. This review aims to summarize the most important leaf morpho-physiological constraints of WUE in C

Indexed as

Crown architectureleaf anatomymesophyll conductanceminimal conductancerespirationrubiscostomataWUE

Identifiers

PMID37560762
PMCPMC10407996

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.