ArticleHeliyon2023
Qualitative feasibility study of the mobile app Destroke for clinical stroke monitoring based on the NIH stroke scale.
Article in Heliyon, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Stroke is a leading cause of severe disability in the United States, but there is no effective method for patients to accurately detect the signs of stroke at home. We developed a mobile app, Destroke, that allows remote performance of a modified NIH stroke scale (NIHSS) by patients. Aims: To assess the feasibility of a mobile app for stroke monitoring and education by patients with a history of stroke. Materials and methods: We enrolled 25 patients with a history of stroke in a prospective open-label study to evaluate the feasibility of the Destroke app in patients with stroke. Nineteen patients completed all study assessments, with a median time from stroke onset to enrollment of 5.6 years (range 0.1-12 years). We designed a modified NIHSS that assessed 12 out of 16 tasks on the NIHSS. Patients completed this test eight times over a 28-day period. We conducted pre-study surveys that assessed demographic information, stroke and cardiovascular history, baseline NIHSS, and experience using mobile technologies, and mid- and post-study surveys that assessed patient satisfaction on app usage and confidence in stroke detection. Results: Ten men and nine women participated in this study (median age of 64 (33-76)), representing ten US states and Washington D.C. Median baseline NIHSS was 0 (0-4). 15 patients reported using health apps. On a 5-point Likert scale, patients rated the app as 4.2 on being able to understand and use the app and 4.3 on using the app when instructed by their doctor. For eight patients with poor confidence in detecting the signs of a stroke before the study, six showed higher confidence after the study. Conclusions: The use of an at-home stroke monitoring app is feasible by patients with a history of stroke and improves confidence in detecting the signs of stroke.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.