ArticleHeliyon2023
Development and application of a spray tip that enables electrocoagulation of a variety of tissues.
Article in Heliyon, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Spray coagulation reduces the use of hemostatic forceps for intraoperative bleeding in gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection.JGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology · 2024Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Spray hemostasis is possible using a high-frequency power source from the tip of an electric scalpel; however, the difficulties regarding the uniformity and rapidity of the hemostasis surface remain. This study reports the development of a novel electrocoagulation device tip that can be used in endoscopic and robotic surgeries and can quickly coagulate and hemostat and easily adjust the extent of cauterization and hemostasis while minimizing the depth of thermal injury. Methods: The safety and efficacy of the hemostatic device were verified in a porcine model. A liver surface transection was conducted in vivo and the rapidity of the hemostatic effect of the device was observed. An extracted stomach, kidney, and liver were cauterized ex vivo by three operators with different surgical skills and the effects were analyzed pathologically. In addition, a sacrificed pig cadaver was used to achieve hemostasis at a renal transection site using the multi-spray endoscope tip. Results: An increase in the number of tip terminals expanded the cauterization surface and shortened the cauterization time. In parenchymatous organs, uniform cauterization was possible without increasing the depth of thermal injury. The cauterization depth did not depend on the operator's skill, and the spray coagulation was safe. The variable spray tip allowed for simple hemostasis during open and laparoscopic surgeries. Conclusions: This novel electrocoagulation device tip can be developed as a forceps that can change the spray range and can be used during laparoscopic and robotic surgeries.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.