ArticleHeliyon2023
Nursing boundaries and work identity construction among nurses exercising an advanced role: A qualitative study.
Article in Heliyon, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Professional Segmentation as a Barrier to Reform in Turkish Nursing.Nursing inquiry · 2026Article
- Personality portraits, resilience, and professional identity among nursing students: a cross-sectional study.BMC nursing · 2024Article
- Exploring Experiences of Conflict within Medical Teams in an Emergency Department: A Focus Group Approach during the COVID-19 Pandemic.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Research on the deployment of advanced practice nurses (APNs) in healthcare settings highlights significant challenges for APNs transitioning to a broader, less well-defined nursing role in negotiating professional boundaries and a new work identity with other health workers. However, theories of boundary-work and professional identity have been rarely applied to APNs relationships with general nurses and colleagues in lower professional position such as nursing-assistants. APNs relationships with these colleagues remain poorly understood. This article aims to contribute to addressing this gap. It is based on qualitative research on a pilot-project prefiguring the introduction of APN (pre-APN) in the French Health system entitled the Prefiguration of Clinical Nurse Specialists (PrefICS). Data were collected through field observations and interviews with pre-APNs, general nurses, nursing-assistants, doctors and nursing hierarchy, to assess the implementation of PrefICS project in four hospitals, one health centre and one cancer control centre. The analysis shows that facing the risk of their role being limited to collaborations with doctors, pre-APNs engaged in different forms of boundary-work with general nurses and nursing-assistants, to negotiate new professional relationships with these colleagues. Some pre-APNs presented themselves as resource persons and led activities aimed at developing and sharing nursing knowledges and competencies with general nurses and nursing-assistants. Other pre-APNs shaped their work identity around a reformist role in terms of both the nursing profession and work environments. Pre-APNs boundary work with general nurses and nursing-assistants produced work spaces in which pre-APNs interwove their work identity with these colleagues by negotiating new professional ties and brokering knowledges between different professional worlds. Changes in levels of pre-APN self-categorization reflected different views of the nursing and nursing-assistant professions, from which pre-APNs started building new alliances for a shared reflective work on their practice and about caring.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.