Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37560630›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2023

Strain measurement with multiplexed FBG sensor arrays: An experimental investigation.

Bruno da Silva Falcão, Ausama Giwelli, Melissa Nogueira Kiewiet, Stephen Banks, George Yabesh, Lionel Esteban, Leigh Kiewiet, Nurudeen Yekeen, Yevhen Kovalyshen, Ludwig Monmusson and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Bruno da Silva FalcãoSchool of Engineering, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup WA 6027, Australia.
Ausama GiwelliCSIRO Energy, Kensington WA 6151, Australia.
Melissa Nogueira KiewietCSIRO Energy, Kensington WA 6151, Australia.
Stephen BanksCSIRO Energy, Clayton VIC 3168, Australia.
George YabeshSchool of Engineering, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup WA 6027, Australia.
Lionel EstebanCSIRO Energy, Kensington WA 6151, Australia.
Leigh KiewietCSIRO Energy, Kensington WA 6151, Australia.
Nurudeen YekeenSchool of Engineering, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup WA 6027, Australia.
Yevhen KovalyshenCSIRO Energy, Kensington WA 6151, Australia.
Ludwig MonmussonCSIRO Energy, Kensington WA 6151, Australia.
Ahmed Al-YaseriSchool of Engineering, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup WA 6027, Australia.
Alireza KeshavarzSchool of Engineering, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup WA 6027, Australia.
Stefan IglauerSchool of Engineering, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup WA 6027, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In conventional rock mechanics testing, radial strain measuring devices are usually attached to the sample's surface at its mid-height. Although this procedure provides a realistic picture of the lateral deformation undergone by homogeneous samples, however, this assumption may not be accurate if the tested rock has significant heterogeneity. Fibre Bragg Grating (FBG) sensors have recently been introduced to various rock testing applications due to their versatility over conventional strain gauges and radial cantilevers. FBG sensors have small size, multiplexing capability, and immunity to magnetic interference. The main objective of this study is to explore and understand the capabilities of FBG sensing for strain measurement during rock mechanics testing, including under confining. To do so, two limestone plugs (Savonnières limestone) and one acrylic Poly Methyl Methacrylate (PMMA) plug, all of 38 mm diameter, were prepared. The acrylic plug and one of the Savonnières samples plugs were subjected to Unconfined Compressive Strength (UCS) tests. The second Savonnières plug was subjected to a hydrostatic test up to 20 MPa confining at room temperature. FBG sensors of 125 μm cladding diameter with ceramics (Ormocer) coating were glued on the surface of each sample, spreading across the entire sample's height. Strain gauges and cantilever-type radial gauges were used on the samples submitted to UCS for comparison. Results show that radial strain measurements and calculated elastic properties derived from the FBG readings for samples are comparable to readings from the conventional strain gauges and cantilever-type devices. Apparent bulk moduli based on volumetric strain computed from FBG radial strain readings during the hydrostatic test on the Savonnières sample was consistent with benchtop measurements conducted on the Savonnières sample and another plug extracted from the same parental block, as well as published literature data. Moreover, variations in the calculated elastic properties are interpreted as evidence that the FBG sensors detected heterogeneities in the samples' inner structure, which can be seen in the density profiles computed from x-ray CT images. Such observation confirms the potential of the presented FBG sensors configuration for 3D strain mapping in rock mechanics tests.

Indexed as

FBG sensorHydrostatic testUnconfined compressive strength (UCS)

Identifiers

PMID37560630
PMCPMC10407675

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.