ReviewRSC advances2023
Recent advances in dynamic modeling and control studies of biomass gasification for production of hydrogen rich syngas.
Review in RSC advances, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Raw Gas Treatment and Conditioning for Methanol Production from Biomass and Waste Gasification.ACS omega · 2026Review
- Integrated valorization of industrial and municipal biomass wastes for green ammonia production: a circular bioeconomy approach.Frontiers in chemistry · 2025Article
- Steady and transient state behavior of a gasification process under fixed-bed downdraft configuration.Heliyon · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The conversion of biomass through thermochemical processes has emerged as a promising approach to meet the demand for alternative renewable fuels. However, these processes are complex, labor-intensive, and time-consuming. To optimize the performance and productivity of these processes, modeling strategies have been developed, with steady-state modeling being the most commonly used approach. However, for precision in biomass gasification, dynamic modeling and control are necessary. Despite efforts to improve modeling accuracy, deviations between experimental and modeling results remain significant due to the steady-state condition assumption. This paper emphasizes the importance of using Aspen Plus® to conduct dynamics and control studies of biomass gasification processes using different feedstocks. As Aspen Plus® is comprising of its Aspen Dynamics environment which provides a valuable tool that can capture the complex interactions between factors that influence gasification performance. It has been widely used in various sectors to simulate chemical processes. This review examines the steady-state and dynamic modeling and control investigations of the gasification process using Aspen Plus®. The software enables the development of dynamic and steady-state models for the gasification process and facilitates the optimization of process parameters by simulating various scenarios. Furthermore, this paper highlights the importance of different control strategies employed in biomass gasification, utilizing various models and software, including the limited review available on model predictive controller, a multivariable MIMO controller.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.