Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37560619›Full record

ReviewRSC advances2023

Recent advances in dynamic modeling and control studies of biomass gasification for production of hydrogen rich syngas.

Maham Hussain, Omer Ali, Nadeem Raza, Haslinda Zabiri, Ashfaq Ahmed, Imtiaz Ali

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in RSC advances, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Maham HussainDepartment of Chemical Engineering, NFC Institute of Engineering & Technology Multan Pakistan maham.hussain@gmail.com.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4384-1139
Omer AliDepartment of Electrical Engineering, NFC Institute of Engineering & Technology Multan Pakistan.
Nadeem RazaDepartment of Chemical Engineering Universiti Teknologi PETRONAS Malaysia.
Haslinda ZabiriCollege of Science, Department of Chemistry, Imam Muhammad Ibn Saud Islamic University, (IMSIU) Riyadh Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
Ashfaq AhmedSchool of Engineering, Victoria University Melbourne Australia.
Imtiaz AliChemical and Materials Engineering Department, King Abdulaziz University Rabigh Saudi Arabia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6303-6164

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The conversion of biomass through thermochemical processes has emerged as a promising approach to meet the demand for alternative renewable fuels. However, these processes are complex, labor-intensive, and time-consuming. To optimize the performance and productivity of these processes, modeling strategies have been developed, with steady-state modeling being the most commonly used approach. However, for precision in biomass gasification, dynamic modeling and control are necessary. Despite efforts to improve modeling accuracy, deviations between experimental and modeling results remain significant due to the steady-state condition assumption. This paper emphasizes the importance of using Aspen Plus® to conduct dynamics and control studies of biomass gasification processes using different feedstocks. As Aspen Plus® is comprising of its Aspen Dynamics environment which provides a valuable tool that can capture the complex interactions between factors that influence gasification performance. It has been widely used in various sectors to simulate chemical processes. This review examines the steady-state and dynamic modeling and control investigations of the gasification process using Aspen Plus®. The software enables the development of dynamic and steady-state models for the gasification process and facilitates the optimization of process parameters by simulating various scenarios. Furthermore, this paper highlights the importance of different control strategies employed in biomass gasification, utilizing various models and software, including the limited review available on model predictive controller, a multivariable MIMO controller.

Identifiers

PMID37560619
PMCPMC10407878

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.