Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37560588›Full record

ArticleSurgical neurology international2023

The rule of five: A novel anatomical landmark for approaching cavernous sinus content.

Juan Armando Mejia, Maximiliano Paez Nova, Luis Garcia Rairan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical neurology international, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Juan Armando MejiaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Fundacion Santa Fe de Bogota, Bogota, Colombia.
Maximiliano Paez NovaDepartment of Neurosurgery, High Complexity Clinic of the Caribbean, Valledupar, Colombia.
Luis Garcia RairanFaculty of Medicine, Universidad El Bosque, Bogota, Colombia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The main objective of this study is to enhance neurosurgeons' anatomical knowledge by providing specific anatomical references of the cavernous sinus (CS). However, it is essential to clarify that our study does not seek to establish an absolute intraoperative rule due to the inherent anatomical variability that must be considered. Methods: Fifty-three cadaveric specimens were procured from the Forensic Institute (Bogotá) and subjected to dissection through an extradural approach. The measurements were taken in two distinct phases. The first phase involved the measurement of various anatomical structures in 25 specimens with respect to the anterior and posterior clinoids. The second phase, which was conducted 5 years later, involved the measurement of the distance between the foramen rotundum and the foramen ovale in 28 specimens using the L&W tools microcaliper. Results: In 25 specimens, a perpendicular imaginary line was drawn from the lateral tip of the anterior clinoid to the floor of the medial fossa. This facilitated access to the Parkinson's triangle, which is located between the IV cranial nerve and the ophthalmic V1 nerve, revealing a constant distance of 5 mm between the lateral tip of the anterior clinoid and the IV cranial nerve. Furthermore, in 28 specimens, the mean distance from the foramen rotundum to the foramen ovale was found to be 1.3 cm bilaterally. Conclusion: The rule of five is a valuable tool for comprehensively understanding the anatomy of the CS, providing a reference point for the different normal anatomical structures within the CS.

Indexed as

AnatomyCavernous sinusCranial nervesMicrosurgical anatomyTriangles

Identifiers

PMID37560588
PMCPMC10408645

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.