ArticleSurgical neurology international2023
A simple but effective solution for proximal mark absence on some microcatheters in intracranial aneurysm embolization: Technical note.
Article in Surgical neurology international, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Endovascular coil embolization is increasingly being used for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms and other pathologies such as arteriovenous (AV) malformations and AV fistulas. Appropriate embolization technique requires a microcatheter with two radiopaque marks, one proximal and one distal. We present an alternative coils deployment technique for intracranial aneurysms, using a microcatheter without a proximal radiopaque mark. Methods: We describe the technique for embolization that was used in a 36-year-old female patient, in which we used a microcatheter without a proximal radiopaque mark for coil embolization of an intracranial aneurysm. Results: We used a Headway Duo flow directed microcatheter for a coiling embolization of an intracranial aneurysm, solving the absence of the proximal radiopaque mark by cannulating the microcatheter with a Traxcess 0.014 microguidewire, and placing an external mark on the screen in the proximal portion of the microguidewire 30 mm radiopaque tip to indirectly mark the proximal mark of the microcatheter. Conclusion: There is scarce evidence supporting the use of microcatheters with no proximal radiopaque mark for coil embolization. This report attempts to disclose how an easy and simple technique can be used as a rescue method to solve the proximal radiopaque mark absence during endovascular coil release procedures. To the best of our knowledge, this technique has not been previously described; therefore, its use is not widespread among neurointerventionists.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.