ArticleJournal of dental research, dental clinics, dental prospects2022
Implant-supported zirconia fixed partial dentures cantilevered in the lateral-posterior area: A 4-year clinical results.
Article in Journal of dental research, dental clinics, dental prospects, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effect of implant protrusion length on intrasinus bone formation in transalveolar sinus lift without grafting: a meta-analysis.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2026Article
- Implant-supported fixed prosthodontic treatment for ectodermal dysplasia: a case report.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Synergistic role of oral and maxillofacial surgery and prosthodontics in implant-based rehabilitation: a scoping review protocol.BDJ open · 2026Review
- Cavernous hemangioma: a rare case report in the maxillary sinus.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2026Article
- Facially Driven Full-Arch Implant Rehabilitation with Stackable Metallic and Magnetic Surgical Guides and Immediate Loading: Our Clinical Experience and Scoping Review.Dentistry journal · 2025Review
- Implant-Supported Cantilever Fixed Partial Dentures in the Posterior Region: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on Survival Outcomes.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Digital Accuracy of Closed-Tray Implant Impressions: Influence of Polyvinyl Siloxane Viscosity and Subgingival Posterior Implant Angulation.Dentistry journal · 2025Article
- Immediate Loading of Implants-Supported Fixed Partial Prostheses in Posterior Regions: A Systematic Review.Dentistry journal · 2025Review
- Influence of Pontic Length on the Structural Integrity of Zirconia Fixed Partial Dentures (FPDs).Journal of functional biomaterials · 2025Article
- In vitro fracture resistance of implant-supported terminal zirconia cantilevered frameworks.European oral research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Implant-supported cantilever prostheses enable a more straightforward rehabilitation and may be a therapeutic option to reduce treatment morbidity, costs, and time. This study evaluated the clinical outcomes of fixed implant-supported partial dentures made of monolithic zirconia with a cantilever design to replace missing posterior teeth. Methods: Fifteen partially edentulous patients received 34 implants and were provided with 16 zirconia fixed partial prostheses (FPPs) with one cantilever extension replacing mandibular or maxillary missing posterior and lateral teeth. Patients were re-examined for up to 4 years. Patient ages ranged from 41 to 65 years, with a mean age of 53±12 years; 47% were female, and 53% were male. The patients were observed for a mean period of 42±6 months with a minimum of 3 years and a maximum of 4 years. Results: Peri-implantitis was observed in two cases. No chipping or fracture of any FPP was detected. Loosening of the abutment screw was a technical complication in one case. The rehabilitation survival rate was 100%. Implant-supported zirconia FPP with one mesial cantilever extension provides an aesthetic, functional treatment alternative to replace missing molars, premolars, and canines. These excellent clinical outcomes occurred over a mean observation time of 42±6 months. Conclusion: Using monolithic zirconia milled with CAD-CAM technology might be an alternative to the metal-ceramic restoration in implant-supported FPP with one cantilever.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.