ArticleJournal of arrhythmia2023
Edoxaban treatment in atrial fibrillation in routine clinical care: One-year outcomes of the prospective observational ETNA-AF study in South Korean patients.
Article in Journal of arrhythmia, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Left atrial appendage closure: Current status, unresolved issues, and future perspectives.Cardiovascular intervention and therapeutics · 2026Review
- Edoxaban treatment in atrial fibrillation in routine clinical care: One-year outcomes of the prospective observational ETNA-AF study in South Korean patients.Journal of arrhythmia · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The real-world outcomes of edoxaban treatment in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) were analyzed in the ETNA-AF (Edoxaban Treatment in Routine Clinical Practice) study involving data from multiple regional registries. This report addresses effectiveness and safety of edoxaban in the Korean ETNA-AF population. Methods: One-year data from 1887 Korean ETNA-AF participants were analyzed according to edoxaban dose and patient age and compared with results of other ETNA-AF registries. Results: Approximately 70% of patients received the recommended doses of edoxaban (60 mg/30 mg); non-recommended 60 mg and 30 mg doses were prescribed to 9.6% and 19.8% of the patients, respectively. The proportions of reference age (<65 years), youngest-old (65-74 years) and middle-old/oldest-old (≥75 years) groups were 21.4%, 40.2%, and 38.4%, respectively. Incidence of major or clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding was similar within dose (0.57%-1.71%) and age subgroups (1.26%-1.63%). Incidence of net clinical outcome, a composite of stroke, systemic embolic event, major bleeding, and all-cause mortality, was also comparable among dose subgroups (1.14%-3.10%) and age subgroups (2.28%-2.78%). The percentage of Korean patients receiving non-recommended 30 mg (19.8%) was over twice that of the European population (8.4%). However, the clinical outcomes were generally similar among different populations included in the ETNA-AF study. Conclusions: The outcomes in the Korean ETNA-AF population are like those in the global ETNA-AF population, with overall low event rates of stroke, major bleeding and all-cause mortality across age and dose subgroups. Edoxaban can be used effectively and safely in specific populations of Korean AF patients, including the elderly.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.