ArticleJournal of arrhythmia2023
Validity of MENARI plus (self-pulse assessment and clinical scoring) mobile apps for detecting atrial fibrillation in high-risk population.
Article in Journal of arrhythmia, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Validity of MENARI plus (self-pulse assessment and clinical scoring) mobile apps for detecting atrial fibrillation in high-risk population.Journal of arrhythmia · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Even before it is clinically diagnosed, atrial fibrillation (AF) can cause a stroke. This study validates self-pulse assessment and clinical scoring (MENARI Plus) based on android apps. Objective: The aim of this study was to examine the validity of AF screening using MENARI Plus compared with an ECG recording. Methods: We collected a total of 1385 subjects from high-risk population according to CHA2DS2-VASc score ≥2, attending 8 primary care centers (PCCs) in Malang between July 2021 and December 2021. Every participant underwent self-pulse assessment, and then was evaluated for MENARI Plus Score on android Apps. These cases had been classified as low or high probability for AF (cut-off score 7). After that, electrocardiography examinations were performed and classified with AF and Sinus Rhythm group. Results: In this study, the mean age of these patients was 61.5 ± 6.9 years old. We found that 156/1385 (11%) patients had AF. There were 68/156 (43.5%) new cases of AF. The sensitivity for self-pulse palpation was 73.1% (95% CI: 68%-76%) and specificity was 68.3% (95% CI: 65%-72%). MENARI Plus had an area under the receiver operating curve (AUC) of 0.86 (95% CI: 0.82-0.89) with sensitivity per measurement occasion was (84%, 95% CI: 82%-88%) and specificity was (87.9%, 95% CI: 82%-90%). Conclusion: In this study, we found that MENARI Plus has high sensitivity and specificity for AF. It is therefore useful for ruling out AF. It may also be a useful screen that can be applied opportunistically for previously undetected AFs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.