ArticleAmerican journal of translational research2023
Efficacy and risk factors of traditional denture restoration versus biofunctional complete denture restoration system.
Article in American journal of translational research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Digital Removable Denture Workflows in Dental Education: A Systematic Review and Curriculum Development Exploration.European journal of dental education : official journal of the Association for Dental Education in Europe · 2026Pooled it
- Time-dependent adaptation and clinical efficacy of complete dentures: evidence from a Bayesian mixed-effects model.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Analysis of Modification Zones in Mandibular Complete Denture Models Designed with the Bio-Functional Prosthetic System.Therapeutics and clinical risk management · 2025Article
- Shear bond strength of artificial teeth used with CAD/CAM PMMA versus heat cure acrylic resins for complete denture - A systematic review.Bioinformation · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis study was designed to determine the efficacy of a traditional complete denture and a biofunctional prosthetic system of a complete denture, and risk factors affecting their efficacy.
methodsA retrospective analysis was performed on 95 patients with total dentition loss admitted to our hospital from January 2015 to June 2022. Among them, 45 patients who received traditional dentures were assigned to a control group, and the other 50 who received a biofunctional prosthetic system with complete dentures were assigned to an observation group. The clinical efficacy was compared between the two groups before and after treatment, and the masticatory function indexes and comfort scores of the two groups were also compared. Logistics regression analysis was conducted to analyze the risk factors affecting the efficacy of patients.
resultsThe observation group showed a higher total effective rate than the control group (P<0.05). After treatment, the observation group showed notably higher masticatory efficiency and absorbance of masticatory substances than the control group (P<0.05). In addition, the denture tenderness point in the observation group was notably lower than that in the control group (P<0.05). After treatment, the observation group had notably higher scores in General Comfort Questionnaire than the control group (P<0.05). Moreover, according to Logistics regression analysis, older age, dentition loss caused by tooth defect, smoking history and traditional denture restoration were independent risk factors for ineffective treatment.
conclusionThe biofunctional prosthetic system of complete dentures can better improve the masticatory function and enhance the comfort of patients with total dentition loss, and with good efficacy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
37560251PMC10408514What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.