ArticleComputational and structural biotechnology journal2023
Insight on physicochemical properties governing peptide MS1 response in HPLC-ESI-MS/MS: A deep learning approach.
Article in Computational and structural biotechnology journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Combined NGS and proteomics improves viral diagnostics in wildlife: coronaviruses confirmed in hedgehogs.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Article
- Proteomics and bioinformatics guided discovery of microalgal multifunctional peptides for novel nutraceutical applications.Bioprocess and biosystems engineering · 2025Article
- To Fly, or Not to Fly, That Is the Question: A Deep Learning Model for Peptide Detectability Prediction in Mass Spectrometry.Journal of proteome research · 2025Article
- Rescoring Peptide Spectrum Matches: Boosting Proteomics Performance by Integrating Peptide Property Predictors Into Peptide Identification.Molecular & cellular proteomics : MCP · 2024Review
- Variability analysis of LC-MS experimental factors and their impact on machine learning.GigaScience · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accurate and absolute quantification of peptides in complex mixtures using quantitative mass spectrometry (MS)-based methods requires foreground knowledge and isotopically labeled standards, thereby increasing analytical expenses, time consumption, and labor, thus limiting the number of peptides that can be accurately quantified. This originates from differential ionization efficiency between peptides and thus, understanding the physicochemical properties that influence the ionization and response in MS analysis is essential for developing less restrictive label-free quantitative methods. Here, we used equimolar peptide pool repository data to develop a deep learning model capable of identifying amino acids influencing the MS1 response. By using an encoder-decoder with an attention mechanism and correlating attention weights with amino acid physicochemical properties, we obtain insight on properties governing the peptide-level MS1 response within the datasets. While the problem cannot be described by one single set of amino acids and properties, distinct patterns were reproducibly obtained. Properties are grouped in three main categories related to peptide hydrophobicity, charge, and structural propensities. Moreover, our model can predict MS1 intensity output under defined conditions based solely on peptide sequence input. Using a refined training dataset, the model predicted log-transformed peptide MS1 intensities with an average error of 9.7 ± 0.5% based on 5-fold cross validation, and outperformed random forest and ridge regression models on both log-transformed and real scale data. This work demonstrates how deep learning can facilitate identification of physicochemical properties influencing peptide MS1 responses, but also illustrates how sequence-based response prediction and label-free peptide-level quantification may impact future workflows within quantitative proteomics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.