Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37560085›Full record

ArticleContemporary clinical trials communications2023

Design of VA CoronavirUs Research and Efficacy Studies-1 (VA CURES-1): A double-blind, randomized placebo-controlled trial of COVID-19 convalescent plasma in hospitalized patients with early respiratory compromise.

Edward N Janoff, Sheldon T Brown, Ilana Belitskaya-Levy, Jeffrey L Curtis, Robert A Bonomo, Elliott K Miller, Alexa M Goldberg, Lisa Zehm, Ashlea Wills, Caitlin Hutchinson and 4 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Contemporary clinical trials communications, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04539275 (VA CoronavirUs Research and Efficacy Studies-1), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04539275 phase3terminatednot on this map

VA CoronavirUs Research and Efficacy Studies-1 (VA CURES-1)

TypeinterventionalSponsorVA Office of Research and DevelopmentRan2020 to 2021Enrolled75ConditionsCOVID-19ArmsConvalescent Plasma, Masked Saline Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Edward N JanoffRocky Mountain Regional VA Medical Center, Aurora, CO, USA.
Sheldon T BrownJames J. Peters Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Bronx, NY, USA.
Ilana Belitskaya-LevyDepartment of Veterans Affairs, Cooperative Studies Program Coordinating Center, Palo Alto, CA, USA.
Jeffrey L CurtisVA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Robert A BonomoLouis Stokes Cleveland VA Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Elliott K MillerDepartment of Veterans Affairs, Cooperative Studies Program Clinical Research Pharmacy Coordinating Center, Albuquerque, NM, USA.
Alexa M GoldbergDepartment of Veterans Affairs, Cooperative Studies Program Clinical Research Pharmacy Coordinating Center, Albuquerque, NM, USA.
Lisa ZehmDepartment of Veterans Affairs, Cooperative Studies Program Coordinating Center, Palo Alto, CA, USA.
Ashlea WillsRocky Mountain Regional VA Medical Center, Aurora, CO, USA.
Caitlin HutchinsonRocky Mountain Regional VA Medical Center, Aurora, CO, USA.
Larry J DumontUniversity of Colorado Denver School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA.
Theresa GleasonDepartment of Veterans Affairs, Clinical Science Research and Development Service, Washington, DC, USA.
Mei-Chiung ShihDepartment of Veterans Affairs, Cooperative Studies Program Coordinating Center, Palo Alto, CA, USA.
ADD Caitlin MS in CCTC website

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Effective therapeutics for severe acute respiratory syndrome CoronaVirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection are evolving. Under Emergency Use Authorization, COVID-19 convalescent plasma (CCP) was widely used in individuals hospitalized for COVID-19, but few randomized controlled trials supported its efficacy to limit respiratory failure or death. Methods: VA CoronavirUs Research and Efficacy Studies-1 (VA CURES-1) was a double-blind, multi-site, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of CCP with conventional therapy in hospitalized Veterans with SARS-CoV-2 infection and early respiratory compromise (requirement for oxygen). Participants (planned sample size 702) were randomized 1:1 to receive CCP with high titer neutralizing activity or 0.9% saline, stratified by site and age (≥65 versus <65 years old). Participants were followed daily during initial hospitalization and at Days 15, 22 and 28. Outcomes: The composite primary outcome was acute hypoxemic respiratory failure or all-cause death by Day 28. Secondary outcomes by day 28 included time-to-recovery, clinical severity, mortality, rehospitalization for COVID-19, and adverse events. Serial respiratory and blood samples were collected for safety, virologic and immunologic analyses and future studies. Key variables in predicting the success of CURES-1 were: (1) enrollment early in the course of severe infection; (2) use of plasma with high neutralizing activity; (3) reliance on unambiguous, clinically meaningful outcomes. CURES-1 was terminated for futility due to perceived inability to enroll in the lull between the Alpha and Delta waves of the SARS CoV-2 epidemic. Conclusions: VA CURES-1 was a large multi-site trial designed to provide conclusive information about the efficacy of CCP in well-characterized patients at risk for progression of COVID-19. It utilized a rigorous study design with relevant initial timing, quality of product and outcomes. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04539275.

Indexed as

Convalescent plasmaCOVID-19HypoxemiaRandomized controlled trialRespiratory failureWHO ordinal scale

Identifiers

PMID37560085
PMCPMC10407261

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.