Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37560029›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2023

Survey and toxigenic abilities of

Jiajia Meng, Ruijiao Li, Qingwen Huang, Dehua Guo, Kai Fan, Jingya Zhang, Xueting Zhu, Min Wang, Xinyue Chen, Dongxia Nie and 3 more

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Jiajia MengInstitute for Agro-food Standards and Testing Technology, Shanghai Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shanghai, China.
Ruijiao LiSchool of Health Science and Engineering, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Shanghai, China.
Qingwen HuangInstitute for Agro-food Standards and Testing Technology, Shanghai Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shanghai, China.
Dehua GuoTechnical Center for Animal Plant and Food Inspection and Quarantine, Shanghai Customs, Shanghai, China.
Kai FanInstitute for Agro-food Standards and Testing Technology, Shanghai Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shanghai, China.
Jingya ZhangInstitute for Agro-food Standards and Testing Technology, Shanghai Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shanghai, China.
Xueting ZhuInstitute for Agro-food Standards and Testing Technology, Shanghai Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shanghai, China.
Min WangTechnical Center for Animal Plant and Food Inspection and Quarantine, Shanghai Customs, Shanghai, China.
Xinyue ChenInstitute for Agro-food Standards and Testing Technology, Shanghai Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shanghai, China.
Dongxia NieInstitute for Agro-food Standards and Testing Technology, Shanghai Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shanghai, China.
Chen CaoTechnical Center for Animal Plant and Food Inspection and Quarantine, Shanghai Customs, Shanghai, China.
Zhihui ZhaoInstitute for Agro-food Standards and Testing Technology, Shanghai Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shanghai, China.
Zheng HanInstitute for Agro-food Standards and Testing Technology, Shanghai Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shanghai, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A systematic study was carried out on 638 wheat and paddy grains (including fresh and stored samples) collected in 2021 from Shanghai, China, to identify the major mycobiota and their toxigenic abilities. A total of 349 fungi, namely, 252

Indexed as

Alternaria sppAspergillus spp.Fusarium spp.mycotoxinstoxigenic ability

Identifiers

PMID37560029
PMCPMC10407302

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.