Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37559905›Full record

ReviewiScience2023

Integrating public engagement to intensify pollination services through ecological restoration.

Pedro J Bergamo, Kátia F Rito, Blandina F Viana, Edenise Garcia, Eimear Nic Lughadha, Márcia M Maués, André R Rech, Felipe D S Silva, Isabela G Varassin, Kayna Agostini and 12 more

Abstract readReview
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in iScience, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors.

Pedro J BergamoRio de Janeiro Botanical Garden, Rio de Janeiro 22460-030, Brazil.
Kátia F RitoRio de Janeiro Botanical Garden, Rio de Janeiro 22460-030, Brazil.
Blandina F VianaNational Institute of Science and Technology in Interdisciplinary and Transdisciplinary Studies in Ecology and Evolution, Institute of Biology, Federal University of Bahia, Salvador 40170-210, Brazil.
Edenise GarciaInstituto de Conservação Ambiental the Nature Conservancy Brasil, São Paulo 01311-936, Brazil.
Eimear Nic LughadhaConservation Science Department, Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond TW9 9AE, UK.
Márcia M MauésLaboratory of Entomology, Embrapa Eastern Amazon, Belém 66095-903, Brazil.
André R RechCentre of Advanced Studies on Functioning of Ecological Systems and Interactions (CAFESIN-MULTIFLOR), Federal University of the Jequitinhonha and Mucuri Valleys, Diamantina 39100-000, Brazil.
Felipe D S SilvaFederal Institute of Mato Grosso, Barra do Garças 78607-899, Brazil.
Isabela G VarassinLaboratório de Interações e Biologia Reprodutiva, Federal University of Paraná, Curitiba 81531-980, Brazil.
Kayna AgostiniDepartment of Natural Science, Mathematics and Education, Federal University of São Carlos, Araras 13600-970, Brazil.
Marcia C M MarquesBotany Department, Federal University of Paraná, Curitiba 81531-980, Brazil.
Pietro K MaruyamaCentre for Ecological Synthesis and Conservation, Department of Genetics, Ecology and Evolution, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte 31270-901, Brazil.
Nirvia RavenaCentre of Amazonian Studies, Federal University of Pará, de Altos Estudos Amazônicos, Belém 66075-110, Brazil.
Lucas A GaribaldiInstituto de Investigaciones en Recursos Naturales, Agroecología y Desarrollo Rural, Universidad Nacional de Río Negro, San Carlos de Bariloche 8400, Argentina.
Tiffany M KnightGerman Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv), Halle-Jena-Leipzig, Leipzig 04103 Germany.
Paulo E A M OliveiraInstitute of Biology, Federal University of Uberlândia, Uberlândia 38405-302, Brazil.
Alberto K OppataCooperativa Agrícola Mista de Tomé-Açu, Tomé-Açu 68682-000, Brazil.
Antônio M SaraivaPolythecnic School, University of São Paulo, São Paulo 05508-010, Brazil.
Leandro R TambosiFederal University of ABC, Santo André 09210-580, Brazil.
Rodrigo Y TsukaharaFundação ABC Pesquisa e Desenvolvimento Agropecuário, Castro 84165-700, Brazil.
Leandro FreitasRio de Janeiro Botanical Garden, Rio de Janeiro 22460-030, Brazil.
Marina WolowskiInstitute of Natural Sciences, Federal University of Alfenas, Alfenas 37130-001, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Globally, human activities impose threats to nature and the provision of ecosystem services, such as pollination. In this context, ecological restoration provides opportunities to create managed landscapes that maximize biodiversity conservation and sustainable agriculture, e.g., via provision of pollination services. Managing pollination services and restoration opportunities requires the engagement of distinct stakeholders embedded in diverse social institutions. Nevertheless, frameworks toward sustainable agriculture often overlook how stakeholders interact and access power in social arenas. We present a perspective integrating pollination services, ecological restoration, and public engagement for biodiversity conservation and agricultural production. We highlight the importance of a comprehensive assessment of pollination services, restoration opportunities identification, and a public engagement strategy anchored in institutional analysis of the social arenas involved in restoration efforts. Our perspective can therefore guide the implementation of practices from local to country scales to enhance biodiversity conservation and sustainable agriculture.

Indexed as

EcologyEnvironmental scienceSocial sciences

Identifiers

PMID37559905
PMCPMC10407755

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.