Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37559851›Full record

ArticleCureus2023

Utilizing Deep Learning for X-ray Imaging: Detecting and Classifying Degenerative Spinal Conditions.

Muhammad S Ghauri, Akshay J Reddy, Nathaniel Tak, Ethan A Tabaie, Ajay Ramnot, Parsa Riazi Esfahani, Neel Nawathey, Javed Siddiqi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Muhammad S GhauriNeurosurgery, California University of Science and Medicine, Colton, USA.
Akshay J ReddyMedicine, California University of Science and Medicine, Colton, USA.
Nathaniel TakMedicine, Midwestern University Arizona College of Osteopathic Medicine, Glendale, USA.
Ethan A TabaieMedicine, California Northstate University College of Medicine, Elk Grove, USA.
Ajay RamnotNeurosurgery, Desert Regional Medical Center, Palm Springs, USA.
Parsa Riazi EsfahaniMedicine, California University of Science and Medicine, Colton, USA.
Neel NawatheyHealth Sciences, California Northstate University College of Medicine, Elk Grove, USA.
Javed SiddiqiNeurosurgery, Desert Regional Medical Center, Palm Springs, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Degenerative spinal conditions (DSCs) involve a diverse set of pathologies that significantly impact health and quality of life, affecting many individuals at least once during their lifetime. Treatment approaches are varied and complex, reflecting the intricacy of spinal anatomy and kinetics. Diagnosis and management pose challenges, with the accurate detection of lesions further complicated by age-related degeneration and surgical implants. Technological advancements, particularly in artificial intelligence (AI) and deep learning, have demonstrated the potential to enhance detection of spinal lesions. Despite challenges in dataset creation and integration into clinical settings, further research holds promise for improved patient outcomes. Methods This study aimed to develop a DSC detection and classification model using a Kaggle dataset of 967 spinal X-ray images at the Department of Neurosurgery of Arrowhead Regional Medical Center, Colton, California, USA. Our entire workflow, including data preprocessing, training, validation, and testing, was performed by utilizing an online-cloud based AI platform. The model's performance was evaluated based on its ability to accurately classify certain DSCs (osteophytes, spinal implants, and foraminal stenosis) and distinguish these from normal X-rays. Evaluation metrics, including accuracy, precision, recall, and confusion matrix, were calculated.  Results The model achieved an average precision of 0.88, with precision and recall values of 87% and 83.3%, respectively, indicating its high accuracy in classifying DSCs and distinguishing these from normal cases. Sensitivity and specificity values were calculated as 94.12% and 96.68%, respectively. The overall accuracy of the model was calculated to be 89%.  Conclusion These findings indicate the utility of deep learning algorithms in enhancing early DSC detection and screening. Our platform is a cost-effective tool that demonstrates robust performance given a heterogeneous dataset. However, additional validation studies are required to evaluate the model's generalizability across different populations and optimize its seamless integration into various types of clinical practice.

Indexed as

ai and robotics in healthcareartificial intelligence (ai)deep learningdegenerative spine diseasespine injuryx ray

Identifiers

PMID37559851
PMCPMC10407969

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.