Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37559738›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2023

State-level clustering in PrEP implementation factors among family planning clinics in the Southern United States.

Anandi N Sheth, Kimberly P Enders, Micah McCumber, Matthew A Psioda, Aditi Ramakrishnan, Jessica M Sales

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 49% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Anandi N ShethDepartment of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, United States.
Kimberly P EndersDepartment of Biostatistics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States.
Micah McCumberDepartment of Biostatistics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States.
Matthew A PsiodaDepartment of Biostatistics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States.
Aditi RamakrishnanDepartment of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, United States.
Jessica M SalesDepartment of Behavioral, Social, and Health Education Sciences, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United States.
Emory University · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

Virology and Molecular Biomarkers CoreP30AI050409 · NIAID · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI Ann M Chahroudi, Colleen F Kelley · 2002 to 2026
$74.0M
Project-003U24HD089880 · NICHD · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI HUDGENS, MICHAEL G, LAVANGE, LISA · 2016 to 2021
$44.3M
NIAID NIH HHS P30 AI050409NICHD NIH HHS U24 HD089880
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Availability of PrEP-providing clinics is low in the Southern U.S., a region at the center of the U.S. HIV epidemic with significant HIV disparities among minoritized populations, but little is known about state-level differences in PrEP implementation in the region. We explored state-level clustering of organizational constructs relevant to PrEP implementation in family planning (FP) clinics in the Southern U.S. Methods: We surveyed providers and administrators of FP clinics not providing PrEP in 18 Southern states (Feb-Jun 2018, Results: Three clusters (C1-3) were identified with five, three, and four states, respectively. Canonical variable 1 separated C1 and C2 from C3 and was primarily driven by PrEP readiness, HIV-specific implementation climate, PrEP-specific leadership engagement, PrEP attitudes, PrEP knowledge, and general resource availability. Canonical variable 2 distinguished C2 from C1 and was primarily driven by PrEP-specific resource availability, PrEP attitudes, and general implementation climate. All C3 states had expanded Medicaid, compared to 1 C1 state (none in C2). Conclusion: Constructs relevant for PrEP implementation exhibited state-level clustering, suggesting that tailored strategies could be used by clustered states to improve PrEP provision in FP clinics. Medicaid expansion was a common feature of states within C3, which could explain the similarity of their implementation constructs. The role of Medicaid expansion and state-level policies on PrEP implementation warrants further exploration.

Indexed as

Anti-HIV AgentsHIV InfectionsPre-Exposure ProphylaxisFamily Planning ServicesHumansMedicaidUnited StatesAnti-HIV Agentsfamily planningimplementationPrEPSouthern U.S.women

Identifiers

PMID37559738
PMCPMC10407092
OpenAlexW4385260615

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.