Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37559735›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2023

SARS-CoV-2 spike-protein targeted serology test results and their association with subsequent COVID-19-related outcomes.

Harvey W Kaufman, Stanley Letovsky, William A Meyer, Laura Gillim, Magdalene M Assimon, Carly A Kabelac, John W Kroner, Shannon L Reynolds, Marcia Eisenberg

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Immune Profile in COVID-19: Unveiling TInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Harvey W KaufmanQuest Diagnostics®, Secaucus, NJ, United States.
Stanley LetovskyLabcorp®, Burlington, NC, United States.
William A MeyerQuest Diagnostics®, Secaucus, NJ, United States.
Laura GillimLabcorp®, Burlington, NC, United States.
Magdalene M AssimonAetion, Inc.®, New York, NY, United States.
Carly A KabelacAetion, Inc.®, New York, NY, United States.
John W KronerAetion, Inc.®, New York, NY, United States.
Shannon L ReynoldsAetion, Inc.®, New York, NY, United States.
Marcia EisenbergLabcorp®, Burlington, NC, United States.
Aetion (United States) · USLabCorp (United States) · USQuest Diagnostics (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: In the absence of evidence of clinical utility, the United States' Centers for Disease Control and Prevention does not currently recommend the assessment of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) spike-protein antibody levels. Clinicians and their patients, especially immunocompromised patients, may benefit from an adjunctive objective clinical laboratory measure of risk, using SARS-CoV-2 serology. Objective: The aim of this study is to estimate the association between SARS-CoV-2 spike-protein targeted antibody levels and clinically relevant outcomes overall and among clinically relevant subgroups, such as vaccine and immunocompetency statuses. Design: A retrospective cohort study was conducted using laboratory-based data containing SARS-CoV-2 antibody testing results, as well as medical and pharmacy claim data. SARS-CoV-2 testing was performed by two large United States-based reference clinical laboratories, Labcorp Exposures: Exposure is defined as having SARS-CoV-2 spike-protein targeted antibody testing. Main outcomes and measures: Study outcomes were SARS-CoV-2 infection and a serious composite outcome (hospitalization with an associated SARS-CoV-2 infection or all-cause death). Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Propensity score matching was used for confounding covariate control. Results: In total, 143,091 (73.2%) and 52,355 (26.8%) eligible individuals had detectable and non-detectable levels of SARS-CoV-2 spike-protein targeted antibodies, respectively. In the overall population, having detectable vs. non-detectable antibodies was associated with an estimated 44% relative reduction in SARS-CoV-2 subsequent infection risk (HR, 0.56; 95% CI 0.53-0.59) and an 80% relative reduction in the risk of serious composite outcomes (HR 0.20; 95% CI 0.15-0.26). Relative risk reductions were observed across subgroups, including among immunocompromised persons. Conclusion and relevance: Individuals with detectable SARS-CoV-2 spike-protein targeted antibody levels had fewer associated subsequent SARS-CoV-2 infections and serious adverse clinical outcomes. Policymakers and clinicians may find SARS-CoV-2 spike-protein targeted serology testing to be a useful adjunct in counseling patients with non-detectable antibody levels about adverse risks and reinforcing appropriate actions to mitigate such risks.

Indexed as

COVID-19COVID-19 TestingHumansRetrospective StudiesSARS-CoV-2Spike Glycoprotein, CoronavirusUnited StatesSpike Glycoprotein, Coronavirusspike protein, SARS-CoV-2COVID-19immune protectionimmunocompromised conditionsSARS-CoV-2SARS-CoV-2 spike antibody

Identifiers

PMID37559735
PMCPMC10407563
OpenAlexW4385240614

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.