ArticleJournal of thoracic disease2023
Impact of ground glass opacity in a three-dimensional analysis for pathological findings and prognosis in stage IA pure solid lung cancer.
Article in Journal of thoracic disease, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Decoding Malignant Lung Ground Glass Opacities: A Radiologic-Pathologic Study From Pure to Semi-Solid Lesions.Thoracic cancer · 2026Article
- Necessity of systematic lymph node dissection in early-stage pure solid lung cancer adjacent to the mediastinum.Updates in surgery · 2026Article
- Article
- Identification of the optimal threshold for predicting the infiltration degree of T1-stage lung adenocarcinoma using solid component volume and three-dimensional consolidation-to-tumor ratio in threshold segmentation.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2025Article
- Not all that glitters is gold.Journal of thoracic disease · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: We investigated whether a three-dimensional (3D) analysis could correct the discrepancy between conventional computed tomography findings and pathological findings and contribute to prognostic stratification in early pure solid lung cancer. Methods: A total of 370 patients with two-dimensional (2D) pure solid, clinical stage IA non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who underwent complete resection at our hospital between January 2010 and March 2021 were included in the present study. We classified the patients into the 3D solid group and the 3D ground glass opacity (GGO) group according to the consolidation volume/tumor volume ratio (C/T volume ratio) measured using a Synapse Vincent 3D analysis workstation, and compared the pathological findings and prognosis between the two groups. Results: There were 142 (38.4%) patients in the 3D GGO group. Lepidic lesions were significantly more frequent in the 3D GGO group (27.6% Conclusions: The C/T volume ratio determined by a 3D analysis detects GGO and reflects the pathological findings, and further prognostic stratification is possible in early 2D pure solid lung cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.