ReviewJournal of thoracic disease2023
Extracorporeal life support in thoracic emergencies-a narrative review of current evidence.
Review in Journal of thoracic disease, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in adult trauma patients with refractory acute cardiopulmonary failure: guideline from the Chinese society of extracorporeal life support 2025.Critical care (London, England) · 2025Guideline
- Article
- Thoracic trauma WSES-AAST guidelines.World journal of emergency surgery : WJES · 2025Review
- Perioperative Mechanical Circulatory Support for Cardiac Assistance in Thoracic Surgery: A Scoping Review.Artificial organs · 2025Article
- Surgical stabilization of rib fractures under extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: A case report.Trauma case reports · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Objective: Resuscitative therapies for respiratory and cardiac failure are lifesaving and extended by using extracorporeal life support (ECLS) as mechanical circulatory support (MSC). This review informs the debate to identify the life-threatening thoracic emergencies in which patients may be cannulated for ECLS support. Methods: An advanced search was performed in PubMed, Embase, Google Scholar, and references query, assessed in June 2022, identified 761 records. Among them, 74 publications in English were included in the current narrative review. Key Content and Findings: ECLS is an additional tool for organ support in life-threatening thoracic emergencies. It provides bridging to recovery or to decision about destination as definitive therapy, intervention, or surgery. Non-traumatic emergencies include mediastinal mass, acute lung injury (ALI), aspiration, embolisms, acute and chronic heart failure. However, based on the current evidence, trauma, and especially blunt thoracic trauma, is one of the main indications for ECLS use in thoracic emergencies, among others in chest wall fractures, blunt and penetrating lung injuries. ECLS use is always individualized to patient's needs, injury pattern and kind of organ failure, circulatory arrest inclusive, depending on if respiratory or cardiac and circulatory support is needed. Further, ECLS offers the possibility for fast volume resuscitation and rewarming, thus preventing the lethal of trauma: hypothermia, hypoperfusion and acidosis. Anticoagulation may be omitted for some hours or days. Interdisciplinary cooperation between the intensivists, surgeons, anesthesiologists, emergency medical services, an appropriately organized and trained staff, equipment resources and logistical planning are essential for successful outcomes. Conclusions: ECLS use in selected life-threatening thoracic emergencies is increasing. The summarized findings appeal to policymakers, and we hope that our summary of recommendations may impact clinical practice and research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.