ArticleJournal of thoracic disease2023
Different nodal upstaging rates and prognoses for patients with clinical T1N0M0 lung adenocarcinoma classified according to the presence of solid components in the lung and mediastinal windows.
Article in Journal of thoracic disease, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Improving the preoperative diagnosis of invasive lung adenocarcinoma by combining multiplanar volume rendering (MPVR)-based solid component measurement with pathological analysis.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026Article
- Preoperative circulating tumor DNA detection and occult lymph node metastases in clinical stage I lung cancer: The lung DETECT study.JTCVS open · 2026Article
- Diagnostic accuracy of computer-aided detection (CAD)-derived solid component proportion and mean CT attenuation for predicting invasiveness in pulmonary part-solid nodules: a retrospective study.Journal of thoracic disease · 2025Article
- Distinct impacts of radiological appearance on lymph node metastasis and prognosis based on solid size in clinical T1 non-small cell lung cancer.Respiratory research · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Little is known about the correlation between nodal upstaging and pulmonary nodules classified according to the presence of solid components in the lung and mediastinal windows. This study thus aimed to analyze the risk factors of nodal upstaging and prognosis based on different imaging features, clinical characteristics, and pathological results from patients with clinical stage T1N0M0 lung adenocarcinoma. Methods: A total of 340 patients between January 2016 and June 2017 were selected from the Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University database. Imaging features, clinical characteristics, and pathological results were collected for survival and analysis of nodal upstaging risk factors. We used logistic regression models to identify important metastatic risk factors for nodal upstaging. Survival rates were calculated using Kaplan-Meier (KM) survival curves and compared with the log-rank test. Significant prognostic risk factors were identified using the Cox proportional hazards model. Results: A total of 340 patients, with an average age of 64.89 (±8.775) years, were enrolled. Among them, nonnodal upstaging occurred both in 77 (22.6%) patients with pure ground-glass nodules (pGGNs) and in 30 (8.8%) patients with heterogenous ground-glass nodules (hGGNs). Compared to the 92 (27.1%) patients with real part-solid nodules (rPSNs), the 141 (41.5%) patients with solid nodules were significantly different in terms of in nodal upstaging (P<0.001). Moreover, preoperative carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) level >3.4 µg/L [odds ratio (OR): 2.931; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.511-5.688; P=0.001], imaging tumor size >18.3 mm (OR, 3.482; 95% CI: 1.609-7.535; P=0.002), and consolidation tumor ratio (CTR) >0.788 (OR 8.791; 95% CI: 3.570-21.651; P<0.001) were independent risk factors for nodal upstaging. The KM survival curve results showed that patients with pGGNs and those with hGGNs had a much better 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) and 5-year overall survival (OS) than did those with rPSNs and those with solid nodules (DFS: 98.7% Conclusions: Patients with pGGNs and those with hGGNs were more likely to be free of nodal upstaging and had better prognosis than did those with clinical stage IA rPSNs and solid nodules. The patients with pGGNs or hGGNs with preoperative CEA level <3.4 µg/L, imaging tumor size <18.3 mm, and CTR <0.788 can choose systematic lymph node sampling (SLNS) or decline lymph node dissection to avoid postoperative complications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.