Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37559539›Full record

SynthesisCurrent neuropharmacology2023

Machine Learning and Pharmacogenomics at the Time of Precision Psychiatry.

Antonio Del Casale, Giuseppe Sarli, Paride Bargagna, Lorenzo Polidori, Alessandro Alcibiade, Teodolinda Zoppi, Marina Borro, Giovanna Gentile, Clarissa Zocchi, Stefano Ferracuti and 3 more

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Current neuropharmacology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. An Umbrella Review of the Fusion of fMRI and AI in Autism.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Antonio Del CasaleDepartment of Dynamic and Clinical Psychology and Health Studies, Faculty of Medicine and Psychology, Sapienza University; Unit of Psychiatry, 'Sant'Andrea' University Hospital, Rome, Italy.
Giuseppe SarliDepartment of Neuroscience, Mental Health and Sensory Organs (NESMOS), Faculty of Medicine and Psychology, Sapienza University; Unit of Psychiatry, 'Sant'Andrea' University Hospital, Rome, Italy.
Paride BargagnaDepartment of Neuroscience, Mental Health and Sensory Organs (NESMOS), Faculty of Medicine and Psychology, Sapienza University; Unit of Psychiatry, 'Sant'Andrea' University Hospital, Rome, Italy.
Lorenzo PolidoriDepartment of Neuroscience, Mental Health and Sensory Organs (NESMOS), Faculty of Medicine and Psychology, Sapienza University; Unit of Psychiatry, 'Sant'Andrea' University Hospital, Rome, Italy.
Alessandro AlcibiadeDepartment of Neuroscience, Mental Health and Sensory Organs (NESMOS), Faculty of Medicine and Psychology, Sapienza University; Unit of Psychiatry, 'Sant'Andrea' University Hospital, Rome, Italy.
Teodolinda ZoppiDepartment of Neuroscience, Mental Health and Sensory Organs (NESMOS), Faculty of Medicine and Psychology, Sapienza University; Unit of Psychiatry, 'Sant'Andrea' University Hospital, Rome, Italy.
Marina BorroDepartment of Neuroscience, Mental Health and Sensory Organs (NESMOS), Faculty of Medicine and Psychology, Sapienza University; Unit of Laboratory and Advanced Molecular Diagnostics, 'Sant'Andrea' University Hospital, Rome, Italy.
Giovanna GentileDepartment of Neuroscience, Mental Health and Sensory Organs (NESMOS), Faculty of Medicine and Psychology, Sapienza University; Unit of Laboratory and Advanced Molecular Diagnostics, 'Sant'Andrea' University Hospital, Rome, Italy.
Clarissa ZocchiDepartment of Neuroscience, Mental Health and Sensory Organs (NESMOS), Faculty of Medicine and Psychology, Sapienza University; Unit of Psychiatry, 'Sant'Andrea' University Hospital, Rome, Italy.
Stefano FerracutiDepartment of Human Neuroscience, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Sapienza University, Unit of Risk Management, 'Sant'Andrea' University Hospital, Rome, Italy.
Robert PreissnerInstitute of Physiology and Science-IT, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Philippstrasse 12, 10115, Berlin, Germany.
Maurizio SimmacoDepartment of Neuroscience, Mental Health and Sensory Organs (NESMOS), Faculty of Medicine and Psychology, Sapienza University; Unit of Laboratory and Advanced Molecular Diagnostics, 'Sant'Andrea' University Hospital, Rome, Italy.
Maurizio PompiliDepartment of Neuroscience, Mental Health and Sensory Organs (NESMOS), Faculty of Medicine and Psychology, Sapienza University; Unit of Psychiatry, 'Sant'Andrea' University Hospital, Rome, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Traditional medicine and biomedical sciences are reaching a turning point because of the constantly growing impact and volume of Big Data. Machine Learning (ML) techniques and related algorithms play a central role as diagnostic, prognostic, and decision-making tools in this field. Another promising area becoming part of everyday clinical practice is personalized therapy and pharmacogenomics. Applying ML to pharmacogenomics opens new frontiers to tailored therapeutical strategies to help clinicians choose drugs with the best response and fewer side effects, operating with genetic information and combining it with the clinical profile. This systematic review aims to draw up the state-of-the-art ML applied to pharmacogenomics in psychiatry. Our research yielded fourteen papers; most were published in the last three years. The sample comprises 9,180 patients diagnosed with mood disorders, psychoses, or autism spectrum disorders. Prediction of drug response and prediction of side effects are the most frequently considered domains with the supervised ML technique, which first requires training and then testing. The random forest is the most used algorithm; it comprises several decision trees, reduces the training set's overfitting, and makes precise predictions. ML proved effective and reliable, especially when genetic and biodemographic information were integrated into the algorithm. Even though ML and pharmacogenomics are not part of everyday clinical practice yet, they will gain a unique role in the next future in improving personalized treatments in psychiatry.

Indexed as

Mental DisordersPsychiatryHumansMachine LearningPharmacogeneticsPrecision Medicineartificial intelligenceMachine learningpharmacogenomicsprecision medicineprecision psychiatrytraditional medicine

Identifiers

PMID37559539
PMCPMC10616924

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.