Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37559375›Full record

Trial reportHuman vaccines & immunotherapeutics2023

An open-label, non-randomized study investigating the safety and efficacy of smallpox vaccine, LC16, as post-exposure prophylaxis for mpox.

Noriko Tomita, Junko Terada-Hirashima, Yukari Uemura, Yosuke Shimizu, Haruka Iwasaki, Rina Yano, Tetsuya Suzuki, Sho Saito, Nobumasa Okumura, Wataru Sugiura and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Modelling international spread of clade IIb mpox on the Asian continent.Bulletin of the World Health Organization · 2025
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Noriko TomitaCentre for Clinical Sciences, National Centre for Global Health and Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-0093-2540
Junko Terada-HirashimaCentre for Clinical Sciences, National Centre for Global Health and Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-1437-5896
Yukari UemuraCentre for Clinical Sciences, National Centre for Global Health and Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-3013-7775
Yosuke ShimizuCentre for Clinical Sciences, National Centre for Global Health and Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-9255-3395
Haruka IwasakiDisease Control and Prevention Centre, National Centre for Global Health and Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Rina YanoCentre for Clinical Sciences, National Centre for Global Health and Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Tetsuya SuzukiDisease Control and Prevention Centre, National Centre for Global Health and Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-3165-9062
Sho SaitoDisease Control and Prevention Centre, National Centre for Global Health and Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Nobumasa OkumuraDisease Control and Prevention Centre, National Centre for Global Health and Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-0434-4842
Wataru SugiuraCentre for Clinical Sciences, National Centre for Global Health and Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Norio OhmagariDisease Control and Prevention Centre, National Centre for Global Health and Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Mugen UjiieDisease Control and Prevention Centre, National Centre for Global Health and Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-8150-075X
National Center for Global Health and Medicine · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mpox is an acute exanthematous disease caused by the monkeypox virus. Since May 2022, it has spread as a community-acquired infection, mainly in Europe and the United States, and urgent measures to prevent this infection were also required in Japan. In this study, we investigated the post-exposure prophylaxis of mpox and safety after inoculating the smallpox vaccine. Participants in close contact with patients with mpox were inoculated with "Freeze-dried cell culture Smallpox Vaccine LC16," within 14 days after close contact. Six cases were registered, and all the participants were inoculated. No mpox symptoms or related complications were observed in the participants for 21 days after the close contact. Adverse events due to inoculation, such as rash, fever, lymphadenopathy, and local reaction at the inoculation site (comprising erythema, swelling, induration, and pain) were observed in the participants; however, all inoculation-related events were non-severe and non-serious, and the participants recovered during the 28-day observation period. The findings of this study suggest that inoculation with LC16 is an effective post-exposure prophylaxis in individuals who had close contact with patients with mpox. Further large-scale studies are warranted to validate these findings.

Indexed as

ExanthemaMpox, MonkeypoxPost-Exposure ProphylaxisSmallpox VaccineAntigens, ViralCell Culture TechniquesHumansAntigens, ViralSmallpox Vaccineadverse eventsLC16Mpoxmpox vaccinenon-randomized studyopen-labelpost-exposure prophylaxissmallpox vaccinevaccine efficacyvaccine safety

Identifiers

PMID37559375
PMCPMC10416734
OpenAlexW4385716617

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.