ArticleKidney research and clinical practice2026
The feasibility of incremental peritoneal dialysis for older patients on peritoneal dialysis.
Article in Kidney research and clinical practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Successful management of catheter injury or refractory infection by partial replantation of peritoneal dialysis catheters: a retrospective observational study.BMC nephrology · 2025Observational
- Effects of initial peritoneal dialysis prescription on clinical outcomes in Japanese peritoneal dialysis patients: a cohort study.Scientific reports · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThis study was performed to investigate the feasibility of incremental peritoneal dialysis (iPD) in older patients.
methodsIn this retrospective cohort study, we enrolled peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients with age ≥ 60 years old at our center from 2008 to 2017. The patients were divided into two groups based on the daily PD exchanges: iPD group (≤3 × 2 L exchanges), and full dose group (≥4 × 2 L exchanges). Kaplan-Meier curves and multivariate Cox regression models were applied to evaluate the risks of anuria and mortalities between groups.
resultsA total of 238 patients (186 in full dose group and 52 in iPD group) were enrolled. The mean age was 67.8 ± 5.7 years, and 45.8% were females. The baseline glomerular filtration rate was 4.15 ± 2.39 mL/min/1.73 m2 . Multivariate Cox regression models showed that patients in the iPD group patients had significantly decreased risk of anuria (hazard ratio [HR], 0.44; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.24-0.81; p = 0.008), and all-cause mortality (HR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.36-0.98; p = 0.04). Additionally, the incidence of peritonitis was significantly lower in the iPD group than that in the full dose group (0.115 vs. 0.197 episodes per person-year, p = 0.03) during the 36 months of PD commencement.
conclusionOlder patients with iPD were independently associated with better preservation of residual kidney function and survival outcomes. Moreover, iPD regimens are also associated with reduced incidence of peritonitis. The iPD strategy might offer a feasible option for older patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.