ArticleEuropean journal of medical research2023
Development and validation a model for predicting overall survival of bladder cancer with lung metastasis: a population-based study.
Article in European journal of medical research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Site-specific heterogeneity in treatment response among patients with metastatic bladder cancer: implications for oligometastatic disease-a retrospective cohort study.Translational andrology and urology · 2026Article
- Oncological outcome and survival predictors of widowed patients with bladder cancer in special populations.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Development and validation of a nomogram for predicting venous thromboembolism risk in post-surgery patients with cervical cancer.World journal of surgical oncology · 2024Article
- Article
- Predicting distant metastasis of bladder cancer using multiple machine learning models: a study based on the SEER database with external validation.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAlthough the number of patients with bladder cancer and lung metastasis is increasing there is no accurate model for predicting survival in these patients.
methodsPatients enrolled in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database between 2010 and 2015 were selected for the study. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression were used to determine independent prognostic factors, followed by development of a nomogram based on the multivariate Cox regression models. The consistency index, receiver operating characteristic curve, and calibration curve were used to validate the prognostic nomogram.
results506 eligible bladder cancer patients with lung metastasis were enrolled in the study and then divided randomly into training and validation sets (n = 356 vs. n = 150). Multivariate Cox regression analysis indicated that age at diagnosis, primary site, histological type, surgery of the primary site, chemotherapy, bone metastasis, and liver metastasis were prognostic factors for overall survival (OS) in patients with lung metastasis in the training set. The C-index of the nomogram OS was 0.699 and 0.747 in the training and validation sets, respectively. ROC curve estimation of the nomogram in the training and validation sets showed acceptable accuracy for classifying 1-year survival, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.766 and 0.717, respectively. More importantly, the calibration plot showed the nomogram had favorable predictive accuracy in both the training and validation sets.
conclusionsThe prognostic nomogram created in our study provides an individualized diagnosis, remedy, and risk evaluation for survival in patients with bladder cancer and lung metastasis. The nomogram would therefore enable clinicians to make more precise treatment decisions for patients with bladder cancer and lung metastasis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.