Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37559098›Full record

ArticleAlgorithms for molecular biology : AMB2023

The solution surface of the Li-Stephens haplotype copying model.

Yifan Jin, Jonathan Terhorst

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Algorithms for molecular biology : AMB, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Yifan JinDepartment of Statistics, University of Michigan, 1085 South University Avenue, Ann Arbor, MI, 48103, USA.
Jonathan TerhorstDepartment of Statistics, University of Michigan, 1085 South University Avenue, Ann Arbor, MI, 48103, USA. jonth@umich.edu.

Funding

Large-scale phylodynamics under non-neutral and non-treelike models of evolutionR35GM151145 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Jonathan G Terhorst · 2023 to 2026
$1.5M
NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM151145NIH HHS R35GM151145
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Li-Stephens (LS) haplotype copying model forms the basis of a number of important statistical inference procedures in genetics. LS is a probabilistic generative model which supposes that a sampled chromosome is an imperfect mosaic of other chromosomes found in a population. In the frequentist setting which is the focus of this paper, the output of LS is a "copying path" through chromosome space. The behavior of LS depends crucially on two user-specified parameters, [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text], which are respectively interpreted as the rates of mutation and recombination. However, because LS is not based on a realistic model of ancestry, the precise connection between these parameters and the biological phenomena they represent is unclear. Here, we offer an alternative perspective, which considers [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] as tuning parameters, and seeks to understand their impact on the LS output. We derive an algorithm which, for a given dataset, efficiently partitions the [Formula: see text] plane into regions where the output of the algorithm is constant, thereby enumerating all possible solutions to the LS model in one go. We extend this approach to the "diploid LS" model commonly used for phasing. We demonstrate the usefulness of our method by studying the effects of changing [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] when using LS for common bioinformatic tasks. Our findings indicate that using the conventional (i.e., population-scaled) values for [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] produces near optimal results for imputation, but may systematically inflate switch error in the case of phasing diploid genotypes.

Indexed as

Haplotype copying modelLi-Stephens modelSolution path

Identifiers

PMID37559098
PMCPMC10410957

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.