Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37559072›Full record

ReviewBMC medical research methodology2023

Methodological issues of the electronic health records' use in the context of epidemiological investigations, in light of missing data: a review of the recent literature.

Thomas Tsiampalis, Demosthenes Panagiotakos

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BMC medical research methodology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. A novel hyperparameter search approach for accuracy and simplicity in disease prediction risk scoring.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Thomas TsiampalisDepartment of Nutrition and Dietetics, School of Health Sciences and Education, Harokopio University, Athens, Greece.
Demosthenes PanagiotakosDepartment of Nutrition and Dietetics, School of Health Sciences and Education, Harokopio University, Athens, Greece. dbpanag@hua.gr.
Harokopio University of Athens · GRUniversity of Canberra · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundElectronic health records (EHRs) are widely accepted to enhance the health care quality, patient monitoring, and early prevention of various diseases, even when there is incomplete or missing information in them.

aimThe present review sought to investigate the impact of EHR implementation on healthcare quality and medical decision in the context of epidemiological investigations, considering missing or incomplete data.

methodsGoogle scholar, Medline (via PubMed) and Scopus databases were searched for studies investigating the impact of EHR implementation on healthcare quality and medical decision, as well as for studies investigating the way of dealing with missing data, and their impact on medical decision and the development process of prediction models. Electronic searches were carried out up to 2022.

resultsEHRs were shown that they constitute an increasingly important tool for both physicians, decision makers and patients, which can improve national healthcare systems both for the convenience of patients and doctors, while they improve the quality of health care as well as they can also be used in order to save money. As far as the missing data handling techniques is concerned, several investigators have already tried to propose the best possible methodology, yet there is no wide consensus and acceptance in the scientific community, while there are also crucial gaps which should be addressed.

conclusionsThrough the present thorough investigation, the importance of the EHRs' implementation in clinical practice was established, while at the same time the gap of knowledge regarding the missing data handling techniques was also pointed out.

Indexed as

Electronic Health RecordsPhysiciansHumansMEDLINEPubMedQuality of Health CareElectronic health recordHealthcare qualityMedical decisionMissing dataSave cost and time

Identifiers

PMID37559072
PMCPMC10410989
OpenAlexW4385706785

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.