Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37558953›Full record

ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2023

Phenotypic Chemical Screening in CD4

Adam P Cribbs, Udo Oppermann

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 62% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Adam P CribbsBotnar Research Centre, NIHR BRC Oxford, Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK. adam.cribbs@ndorms.ox.ac.uk.
Udo OppermannBotnar Research Centre, NIHR BRC Oxford, Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre · GB

Funding

Cancer Research UKDepartment of HealthMedical Research Council MR/V010182/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chemical biology provides an attractive approach to identify genes involved in a particular biological process. This screening approach has its advantages because the assays are usually non-destructive, and analysis can be performed even if the mechanism of action is unknown. During an immune reaction, cells upregulate the expression and secretion of small proteins called cytokines that have specific effects on the interactions and communication between cells. Here, we describe the principles and steps involved in the execution of chemical screening for identifying epigenetic inhibitors that affect cytokine production in differentiated Th1, Th2, and Th17 cells. Our approach provides a rationale for identifying epigenetic chemical compounds that are capable of controlling CD4

Indexed as

CD4-Positive T-LymphocytesTh1 CellsCytokinesEpigenesis, GeneticTh17 CellsTh2 CellsCytokinesCytokinesEpigenetic inhibitorImmune cellsT helper cell

Identifiers

PMID37558953
OpenAlexW4385712106

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.