Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37558942›Full record

ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2023

Characterization of Cellular Viability Using Label-Free Brightfield Live-Cell Imaging.

Lewis Elson, Amelie Tjaden, Stefan Knapp, Susanne Müller

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Lewis ElsonInstitute of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany.
Amelie TjadenInstitute of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany.
Stefan KnappInstitute of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany.
Susanne MüllerInstitute of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany. susanne.mueller-knapp@bmls.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In recent years, the assembly and annotation of chemogenomic libraries have gained interest by the phenotypic screening community. Apart from basic annotations of the compound potency and selectivity, these compound libraries benefit in particular from annotation regarding the effect of the inhibitors on cellular viability to distinguish between on-target effects of a compound and unspecific cytotoxicity. Here, we provide a protocol to determine viability as a first determinant in compound quality control, using the Incucyte live-cell imaging system. The compounds are classified according to their calculated growth rate to determine a cytotoxic, cytostatic, or healthy outcome. All compounds affecting the growth rate can be further evaluated regarding their specific effects on cell health in a high-content live-cell multiplex assay, described in Chapter 5 .

Indexed as

Cell SurvivalMicroscopyCytotoxicityGrowth ratePhenotypic screeningViability assay

Identifiers

PMID37558942

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.