Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37558939›Full record

ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2023

Compilation of Custom Compound/Bioactivity Datasets from Public Repositories.

Laura Isigkeit, Daniel Merk

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Laura IsigkeitInstitute of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany.
Daniel MerkInstitute of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany. daniel.merk@cup.lmu.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Public repositories containing compound-bioactivity data for millions of small molecules offer a valuable resource for chemogenomic compound candidate search. Nonetheless, owning to nonuniform data mining, these databases are often incomplete, thus advocating the combined use of data from several repositories to increase target coverage and data accuracy. Here, we present a workflow to generate custom datasets from public databases for mining chemogenomic compound candidates. The compiled set provides flags for differences in structural and bioactivity data and enables rapid extraction of potent and selective bioactive compounds.

Indexed as

Data AccuracyData MiningDatabases, FactualBig dataChEMBLCompound selectivityData curationPublic databases

Identifiers

PMID37558939

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.