Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37558933›Full record

ArticleArchives of sexual behavior2024

Intersexual and Intrasexual Differences in Mate Selection Preferences Among Lesbian Women, Gay Men, and Bisexual Women and Men.

Lisa Klümper, Manfred Hassebrauck, Sascha Schwarz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of sexual behavior, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Lisa KlümperSocial Psychology and Personality Psychology, School for Human and Social Sciences, University of Wuppertal, Gaußstraße 20, 42119, Wuppertal, Germany. lisa.kluemper@uni-wuppertal.de.ORCID 0000-0001-8368-3895
Manfred HassebrauckSocial Psychology and Personality Psychology, School for Human and Social Sciences, University of Wuppertal, Gaußstraße 20, 42119, Wuppertal, Germany.
Sascha SchwarzSocial Psychology and Personality Psychology, School for Human and Social Sciences, University of Wuppertal, Gaußstraße 20, 42119, Wuppertal, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-6762-7770

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sex differences in mating strategies and partner preferences are well established. However, most research solely focused on heterosexual women and men. We examined the mate selection, marriage, and age preferences of a sample of lesbian women, gay men, and bisexual women and men (LGB) who took part in an online dating survey. Additionally, we analyzed inter- and intrasexual differences in these preferences. A total of 710 participants rated the importance of 82 mate selection criteria and 10 marriage criteria, and they also indicated their age preferences and short-term and long-term relationship orientation. An exploratory factor analysis suggested 11 relevant domains of mate selection in the LGB sample, with sex, age, and long-term relationship orientation being relevant predictors of differences in these domains. We compared the LGB data with data collected from 21,245 heterosexual women and men on the same mate selection criteria. Results showed that the participants' sex was the most important predictor of differences in mate selection and marriage preferences, while intrasexual variables (sexual orientation and relationship orientation) explained only a small part of the variance. We incorporated the results into the current discussion about partner preferences and sexual orientation.

Indexed as

Homosexuality, FemaleSexual and Gender MinoritiesBisexualityFemaleHeterosexualityHumansMaleMarriageSexual BehaviorBisexualGay menHeterosexualLesbian womenPartner preferencesSexual orientation

Identifiers

PMID37558933
PMCPMC10794314

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.