Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37558825›Full record

ArticleSurgical endoscopy2023

External validation of the Japanese difficulty score for laparoscopic hepatectomy in patients undergoing robotic-assisted hepatectomy.

Ansley Beth Ricker, Joshua M Davis, Benjamin M Motz, Michael Watson, Michael Beckman, Michael Driedger, John B Martinie, Dionisios Vrochides

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ansley Beth RickerDivision of HPB Surgery, Department of Surgery, Atrium Health - Carolinas Medical Center, 1025 Morehead Medical Drive, Suite 600, Charlotte, NC, 28204, USA. Ansley.ricker@atriumhealth.org.ORCID 0000-0002-5982-3912
Joshua M DavisDivision of HPB Surgery, Department of Surgery, Atrium Health - Carolinas Medical Center, Charlotte, NC, USA.
Benjamin M MotzDivision of HPB Surgery, Department of Surgery, Atrium Health - Carolinas Medical Center, Charlotte, NC, USA.
Michael WatsonDivision of HPB Surgery, Department of Surgery, Atrium Health - Carolinas Medical Center, Charlotte, NC, USA.
Michael BeckmanDivision of HPB Surgery, Department of Surgery, Atrium Health - Carolinas Medical Center, Charlotte, NC, USA.
Michael DriedgerDivision of HPB Surgery, Department of Surgery, Atrium Health - Carolinas Medical Center, Charlotte, NC, USA.
John B MartinieDivision of HPB Surgery, Department of Surgery, Atrium Health - Carolinas Medical Center, Charlotte, NC, USA.
Dionisios VrochidesDivision of HPB Surgery, Department of Surgery, Atrium Health - Carolinas Medical Center, Charlotte, NC, USA.
Carolinas Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe Japanese difficulty score (JDS) categorizes laparoscopic hepatectomy into low, intermediate, and high complexity procedures, and correlates with operative and postoperative outcomes. We sought to perform a validation study to determine if the JDS correlates with operative and postoperative indicators of surgical complexity for patients undergoing robotic-assisted hepatectomy.

methodsRetrospective review of 657 minimally invasive hepatectomy procedures was performed between January 2008 through March 2019. Outcomes included operative time, estimated blood loss (EBL), blood transfusion, complications, post-hepatectomy liver failure (PHLF), length of stay, 30-day readmission, and 30-day and 90-day mortality. Patients were grouped based on JDS defined as: low (< 4), intermediate (4-6), and high (7 +) complexity procedures. Statistical comparisons were analyzed by ANOVA or χ

results241 of 657 patients underwent robotic-assisted resection. Of these patients, 137 were included in the analysis based on JDS: 25 low, 58 intermediate, and 54 high. High JDS was associated with more major resections (≥ 4 contiguous segments) versus minor resections (median JDS 8 vs. 5, P < 0.0001). High JDS was associated with significantly longer operative times, higher EBL, and more blood transfusions. High JDS was associated with higher rates of PHLF at 16.7%, compared with 5.2% intermediate and 0.0% low, (P = 0.018). Complication rates, 30-day readmissions, and mortality rates were similar between groups. Median LOS was longer in patients with high JDS compared with intermediate and low (4 days vs. 3 days vs. 2 days; P = 0.0005). DISCUSSION: Higher JDS was associated with multiple indicators of operative complexity, including greater extent of resection, increased operative time, EBL, blood transfusion, PHLF, and LOS. This validation study supports the ability of the JDS to categorize patients undergoing robotic-assisted hepatectomy by complexity.

Indexed as

Hepatic InsufficiencyLaparoscopyLiver FailureLiver NeoplasmsRobotic Surgical ProceduresEast Asian PeopleHepatectomyHumansLength of StayOperative TimePostoperative ComplicationsRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeDifficulty scoreMinimally invasive techniquesRobotic-assisted hepatectomyValidation study

Identifiers

PMID37558825
OpenAlexW4385689625

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.