ArticleJournal of cancer research and clinical oncology2023
A novel coiled-coil domain containing-related gene signature for predicting prognosis and treatment effect of breast cancer.
Article in Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Homeobox Protein BarH-like 1 Promotes Gastric Cancer Progression by Activating Coiled-Coil Domain-Containing Protein 178.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeBreast cancer (BRCA) is a prevalent tumor worldwide. The association between the coiled-coil domain-containing (CCDC) protein family and different tumors has been established. However, the prognostic significance of this protein family in breast cancer remains uncertain.
methodsGene expression and clinical data were obtained from the TCGA, METABRIC, and GEO databases. Prognosis genes were identified using univariate Cox and LASSO Cox regression, leading to the establishment of a prognostic signature. Subsequently, the risk model was conducted based on survival and clinical feature analyses, and a nomogram for prognosis prediction was developed. Furthermore, analyses of biological function, immune characteristics, and drug sensitivity were performed. Finally, single-cell sequencing data were utilized to uncover the expression patterns of genes in the risk model.
resultsFive genes were identified and utilized for risk modeling. The model demonstrated excellent prognostic value as indicated by ROC and Kaplan-Meier analysis. The high-risk group exhibited shorter survival time and higher likelihood of recurrence. Functional annotation indicated a correlation between the risk score and immune pathways. Conversely, the low-risk group displayed a greater enrichment in immune pathways and exhibited more active immune microenvironment characteristics. Additionally, drug sensitivity analysis using both public and our sequencing data revealed that the risk model possessed a broad range of predictive values.
conclusionsWe have developed a gene signature and have verified that patients with low-risk are more likely to have better prognosis and respond positively to therapy. This finding offers a valuable point of reference for BRCA individualized treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.