Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37558733›Full record

ArticleOecologia2023

Catchment-based sampling of river eDNA integrates terrestrial and aquatic biodiversity of alpine landscapes.

Merin Reji Chacko, Florian Altermatt, Fabian Fopp, Antoine Guisan, Thomas Keggin, Arnaud Lyet, Pierre-Louis Rey, Eilísh Richards, Alice Valentini, Conor Waldock and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oecologia, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Rainfall has contrasting effects on aquatic and terrestrial environmental DNA recovered from streams.Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Passive Sampling of Urban Runoff Solids to Capture Environmental DNA for the Detection of Rodents in Urban Spaces.Water environment research : a research publication of the Water Environment Federation · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Merin Reji ChackoUnit of Land Change Science, Swiss Federal Research Institute WSL, Birmensdorf, Switzerland. merin.rejichacko@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6069-4281
Florian AltermattDepartment of Aquatic Ecology, Eawag, Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology, Dübendorf, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4831-6958
Fabian FoppUnit of Land Change Science, Swiss Federal Research Institute WSL, Birmensdorf, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0648-8484
Antoine GuisanDepartment of Ecology and Evolution, University of Lausanne, Geopolis, Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3998-4815
Thomas KegginUnit of Land Change Science, Swiss Federal Research Institute WSL, Birmensdorf, Switzerland.
Arnaud LyetWorld Wildlife Fund, Wildlife Conservation Team, Washington, DC, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4478-2676
Pierre-Louis ReyInstitute of Earth Surface Dynamics, University of Lausanne, Geopolis, Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8101-0627
Eilísh RichardsDepartment of Environmental Systems Science, Institute of Terrestrial Ecosystems, ETH Zürich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Alice ValentiniSPYGEN, Le Bourget-du-Lac, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5829-5479
Conor WaldockUnit of Land Change Science, Swiss Federal Research Institute WSL, Birmensdorf, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2818-9859
Loïc PellissierUnit of Land Change Science, Swiss Federal Research Institute WSL, Birmensdorf, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2289-8259

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Monitoring of terrestrial and aquatic species assemblages at large spatial scales based on environmental DNA (eDNA) has the potential to enable evidence-based environmental policymaking. The spatial coverage of eDNA-based studies varies substantially, and the ability of eDNA metabarcoding to capture regional biodiversity remains to be assessed; thus, questions about best practices in the sampling design of entire landscapes remain open. We tested the extent to which eDNA sampling can capture the diversity of a region with highly heterogeneous habitat patches across a wide elevation gradient for five days through multiple hydrological catchments of the Swiss Alps. Using peristaltic pumps, we filtered 60 L of water at five sites per catchment for a total volume of 1800 L. Using an eDNA metabarcoding approach focusing on vertebrates and plants, we detected 86 vertebrate taxa spanning 41 families and 263 plant taxa spanning 79 families across ten catchments. For mammals, fishes, amphibians and plants, the detected taxa covered some of the most common species in the region according to long-term records while including a few more rare taxa. We found marked turnover among samples from distinct elevational classes indicating that the biological signal in alpine rivers remains relatively localised and is not aggregated downstream. Accordingly, species compositions differed between catchments and correlated with catchment-level forest and grassland cover. Biomonitoring schemes based on capturing eDNA across rivers within biologically integrated catchments may pave the way toward a spatially comprehensive estimation of biodiversity.

Indexed as

DNA, EnvironmentalAnimalsBiodiversityDNA Barcoding, TaxonomicEcosystemEnvironmental MonitoringFishesMammalsVertebratesDNA, EnvironmentalBiodiversity assessmentBiomonitoringEnvironmental DNAMetabarcodingSpatial ecology

Identifiers

PMID37558733
PMCPMC10475001

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.