ArticleCommunications biology2023
Genetic continuity, isolation, and gene flow in Stone Age Central and Eastern Europe.
Article in Communications biology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed.
- Local ancestry inference identifies robust evidence of selection in Neolithic Europe.Molecular biology and evolution · 2026Article
- Ancient genomics study reveals low HLA diversity in eastern hunter-gatherers.Genome biology · 2026Article
- Article
- Tracing chalcolithic population mobility using strontium isotopes and proteomics at Gumelnița site, Romania.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Ancient DNA reveals diverse community organizations in the 5th millennium BCE Carpathian Basin.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Ancient DNA indicates 3,000 years of genetic continuity in the Northern Iranian Plateau, from the Copper Age to the Sassanid Empire.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- A geographic history of human genetic ancestry.Science (New York, N.Y.) · 2025Article
- Article
- The genetic origin of the Indo-Europeans.Nature · 2025Article
- Article
- North Pontic crossroads: Mobility in Ukraine from the Bronze Age to the early modern period.Science advances · 2025Article
- Pre-processing of paleogenomes: mitigating reference bias and postmortem damage in ancient genome data.Genome biology · 2025Article
- Article
- A geographic history of human genetic ancestry.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- READv2: advanced and user-friendly detection of biological relatedness in archaeogenomics.Genome biology · 2024Article
- The Genetic Origin of the Indo-Europeans.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- DietaryScience advances · 2024Article
- Interactions between Trypillian farmers and North Pontic forager-pastoralists in Eneolithic central Ukraine.PloS one · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
28 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The genomic landscape of Stone Age Europe was shaped by multiple migratory waves and population replacements, but different regions do not all show similar patterns. To refine our understanding of the population dynamics before and after the dawn of the Neolithic, we generated and analyzed genomic sequence data from human remains of 56 individuals from the Mesolithic, Neolithic, and Eneolithic across Central and Eastern Europe. We found that Mesolithic European populations formed a geographically widespread isolation-by-distance zone ranging from Central Europe to Siberia, which was already established 10,000 years ago. We found contrasting patterns of population continuity during the Neolithic transition: people around the lower Dnipro Valley region, Ukraine, showed continuity over 4000 years, from the Mesolithic to the end of the Neolithic, in contrast to almost all other parts of Europe where population turnover drove this cultural change, including vast areas of Central Europe and around the Danube River.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.