ArticleScientific reports2023
Red-tailed hawk algorithm for numerical optimization and real-world problems.
Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- An intelligent lung nodule classification model using 3D Trans-DenseUnet++-based lung nodule segmentation.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Optimized parameter estimation of solar PV models using an improved red-tailed hawk algorithm.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Multi-scale attentional feature fusion-based traffic sign detection using image dehazing process of SPP-CAE and improved optimization of YOLOv9 model.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2026Article
- Multi-Strategy Improved POA for Global Optimization Problems and 3D UAV Path Planning.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- A Hybrid SAO and RIME Optimizer for Global Optimization and Cloud Task Scheduling.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Graduate Student Evolutionary Algorithm: A Novel Metaheuristic Algorithm for 3D UAV and Robot Path Planning.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Application of an improved pelican optimization algorithm based on comprehensive strategy in PV parameter identification.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Multi-Strategy Improved Red-Tailed Hawk Algorithm for Real-Environment Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Path Planning.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Zebra optimization algorithm incorporating opposition-based learning and dynamic elite-pooling strategies and its applications.PloS one · 2025Article
- A Reinforced Whale Optimization Algorithm for Solving Mathematical Optimization Problems.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Multiple elite strategy enhanced RIME algorithm for 3D UAV path planning.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Article
- A peer-and self-group competitive behavior-based socio-inspired approach for household electricity conservation.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Hippopotamus optimization algorithm: a novel nature-inspired optimization algorithm.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- A hybrid algorithm of grey wolf optimizer and harris hawks optimization for solving global optimization problems with improved convergence performance.Scientific reports · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study suggests a new nature-inspired metaheuristic optimization algorithm called the red-tailed hawk algorithm (RTH). As a predator, the red-tailed hawk has a hunting strategy from detecting the prey until the swoop stage. There are three stages during the hunting process. In the high soaring stage, the red-tailed hawk explores the search space and determines the area with the prey location. In the low soaring stage, the red-tailed moves inside the selected area around the prey to choose the best position for the hunt. Then, the red-tailed swings and hits its target in the stooping and swooping stages. The proposed algorithm mimics the prey-hunting method of the red-tailed hawk for solving real-world optimization problems. The performance of the proposed RTH algorithm has been evaluated on three classes of problems. The first class includes three specific kinds of optimization problems: 22 standard benchmark functions, including unimodal, multimodal, and fixed-dimensional multimodal functions, IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation 2020 (CEC2020), and IEEE CEC2022. The proposed algorithm is compared with eight recent algorithms to confirm its contribution to solving these problems. The considered algorithms are Farmland Fertility Optimizer (FO), African Vultures Optimization Algorithm (AVOA), Mountain Gazelle Optimizer (MGO), Gorilla Troops Optimizer (GTO), COOT algorithm, Hunger Games Search (HGS), Aquila Optimizer (AO), and Harris Hawks optimization (HHO). The results are compared regarding the accuracy, robustness, and convergence speed. The second class includes seven real-world engineering problems that will be considered to investigate the RTH performance compared to other published results profoundly. Finally, the proton exchange membrane fuel cell (PEMFC) extraction parameters will be performed to evaluate the algorithm with a complex problem. The proposed algorithm will be compared with several published papers to approve its performance. The ultimate results for each class confirm the ability of the proposed RTH algorithm to provide higher performance for most cases. For the first class, the RTH mostly got the optimal solutions for most functions with faster convergence speed. The RTH provided better performance for the second and third classes when resolving the real word engineering problems or extracting the PEMFC parameters.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.