Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37558724›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

Red-tailed hawk algorithm for numerical optimization and real-world problems.

Seydali Ferahtia, Azeddine Houari, Hegazy Rezk, Ali Djerioui, Mohamed Machmoum, Saad Motahhir, Mourad Ait-Ahmed

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Seydali FerahtiaInstitut de Recherche en Énergie Électrique de Nantes Atlantique, IREENA, Nantes University, Saint-Nazaire, France.
Azeddine HouariInstitut de Recherche en Énergie Électrique de Nantes Atlantique, IREENA, Nantes University, Saint-Nazaire, France.
Hegazy RezkCollege of Engineering at Wadi Addawaser, Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University, Al-Kharj, Saudi Arabia.
Ali DjeriouiLaboratoire de Génie Electrique, Dept. of Electrical Engineering, University of M'sila, M'sila, Algeria.
Mohamed MachmoumInstitut de Recherche en Énergie Électrique de Nantes Atlantique, IREENA, Nantes University, Saint-Nazaire, France.
Saad MotahhirENSA, University of Sidi Mohamed Ben Abdellah, Fez, Morocco. saad.motahhir@usmba.ac.ma.
Mourad Ait-AhmedInstitut de Recherche en Énergie Électrique de Nantes Atlantique, IREENA, Nantes University, Saint-Nazaire, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study suggests a new nature-inspired metaheuristic optimization algorithm called the red-tailed hawk algorithm (RTH). As a predator, the red-tailed hawk has a hunting strategy from detecting the prey until the swoop stage. There are three stages during the hunting process. In the high soaring stage, the red-tailed hawk explores the search space and determines the area with the prey location. In the low soaring stage, the red-tailed moves inside the selected area around the prey to choose the best position for the hunt. Then, the red-tailed swings and hits its target in the stooping and swooping stages. The proposed algorithm mimics the prey-hunting method of the red-tailed hawk for solving real-world optimization problems. The performance of the proposed RTH algorithm has been evaluated on three classes of problems. The first class includes three specific kinds of optimization problems: 22 standard benchmark functions, including unimodal, multimodal, and fixed-dimensional multimodal functions, IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation 2020 (CEC2020), and IEEE CEC2022. The proposed algorithm is compared with eight recent algorithms to confirm its contribution to solving these problems. The considered algorithms are Farmland Fertility Optimizer (FO), African Vultures Optimization Algorithm (AVOA), Mountain Gazelle Optimizer (MGO), Gorilla Troops Optimizer (GTO), COOT algorithm, Hunger Games Search (HGS), Aquila Optimizer (AO), and Harris Hawks optimization (HHO). The results are compared regarding the accuracy, robustness, and convergence speed. The second class includes seven real-world engineering problems that will be considered to investigate the RTH performance compared to other published results profoundly. Finally, the proton exchange membrane fuel cell (PEMFC) extraction parameters will be performed to evaluate the algorithm with a complex problem. The proposed algorithm will be compared with several published papers to approve its performance. The ultimate results for each class confirm the ability of the proposed RTH algorithm to provide higher performance for most cases. For the first class, the RTH mostly got the optimal solutions for most functions with faster convergence speed. The RTH provided better performance for the second and third classes when resolving the real word engineering problems or extracting the PEMFC parameters.

Identifiers

PMID37558724
PMCPMC10412609

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.