ArticleScientific reports2023
Foreign DNA detection in genome-edited potatoes by high-throughput sequencing.
Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- A duplex sequencing approach for high-sensitivity detection of genome-edited plants.Food chemistry. Molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Trans-nuclei CRISPR/Cas9: safe approach for genome editing in the edible mushroom excluding foreign DNA sequences.Applied microbiology and biotechnology · 2024Article
- Preface to the special issue "Current Status and Future Prospects for the Development of Crop Varieties and Breeding Materials Using Genome Editing Technology".Plant biotechnology (Tokyo, Japan) · 2023Article
- Integrated gene-free potato genome editing using transient transcription activator-like effector nucleases and regeneration-promoting gene expression byPlant biotechnology (Tokyo, Japan) · 2023Article
- A perspective from the EU: unintended genetic changes in plants caused by NGT-their relevance for a comprehensive molecular characterisation and risk assessment.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Genome editing is a powerful breeding technique that introduces mutations into specific gene sequences in genomes. For genome editing in higher plants, nucleotides for artificial nuclease (e.g. TALEN or CRISPR-Cas9) are transiently or stably introduced into the plant cells. After the introduction of mutations by artificial nucleases, it is necessary to select lines that do not contain the foreign nucleotides to overcome GMO regulation; however, there is still no widely legally authorized and approved method for detecting foreign genes in genome-edited crops. Recently, k-mer analysis based on next-generation sequencing (NGS) was proposed as a new method for detecting foreign DNA in genome-edited agricultural products. Compared to conventional methods, such as PCR and Southern hybridization, in principle, this method can detect short DNA fragments with high accuracy. However, this method has not yet been applied to genome-edited potatoes. In this study, we evaluated the feasibility of k-mer analysis in tetraploid potatoes by computer simulation, and also evaluated whether the k-mer method can detect foreign genes with high accuracy by analyzing samples of genome-edited potatoes. We show that when NGS data (at a depth of × 30 the genome size) are used, the k-mer method can correctly detect foreign genes in the potato genome even with the insertion of DNA fragments of 20 nt in length. Based on these findings, we expect that k-mer analysis will be one of the main methods for detecting foreign genes in genome-edited potatoes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.