Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37558653›Full record

ReviewAnatomy & cell biology2023

Innervation of pineal gland by the nervus conarii: a review of this almost forgotten structure.

Kion Gregory, Tyler Warner, Juan J Cardona, Arada Chaiyamoon, Joe Iwanaga, Aaron S Dumont, R Shane Tubbs

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Anatomy & cell biology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 41% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 5 countries.

Kion GregoryTulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, LA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4273-1525
Tyler WarnerDepartment of Anatomical Sciences, St. George's University, St. George's, Grenada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6460-823X
Juan J CardonaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, LA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4148-5687
Arada ChaiyamoonDepartment of Anatomy, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4748-9021
Joe IwanagaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, LA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8502-7952
Aaron S DumontDepartment of Neurosurgery, Tulane Center for Clinical Neurosciences, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, LA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8077-8992
R Shane TubbsDepartment of Anatomical Sciences, St. George's University, St. George's, Grenada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1317-1047
Tulane University · USKhon Kaen University · THSt. George's University · GD

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The nervus conarii provides sympathetic nerve innervation to the pineal gland, which is thought to be the primary type of stimulus to this gland. This underreported nerve has been mostly studied in animals. One function of the nervus conarii may be to activate pinealocytes to produce melatonin. Others have also found substance P and calcitonin gene-related peptide from the nervus conarii ending in the pineal gland. The following paper reviews the extant medical literature on the nervus conarii including its anatomy and potential function.

Indexed as

AnatomyInnervationNervus conariiPineal glandReview

Identifiers

PMID37558653
PMCPMC10520860
OpenAlexW4385689720

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.