Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37558487›Full record

ArticleInternal medicine (Tokyo, Japan)2024

Applicable Machine Learning Model for Predicting Contrast-induced Nephropathy Based on Pre-catheterization Variables.

Heejung Choi, Byungjin Choi, Sungdam Han, Minjeong Lee, Gyu-Tae Shin, Heungsoo Kim, Minkook Son, Kyung-Hee Kim, Joon-Myoung Kwon, Rae Woong Park and 1 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Internal medicine (Tokyo, Japan), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Heejung ChoiDepartment of Nephrology, Ajou University School of Medicine, Korea.
Byungjin ChoiDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Ajou University School of Medicine, Korea.
Sungdam HanMalgundam Internal Medicine Clinic, Korea.
Minjeong LeeDepartment of Nephrology, Ajou University School of Medicine, Korea.
Gyu-Tae ShinDepartment of Nephrology, Ajou University School of Medicine, Korea.
Heungsoo KimDepartment of Nephrology, Ajou University School of Medicine, Korea.
Minkook SonDepartment of Physiology, College of Medicine, Dong-A University, Korea.
Kyung-Hee KimDepartment of Cardiology, Cardiovascular Center, Incheon Sejong Hospital, Korea.
Joon-Myoung KwonDepartment of Critical Care and Emergency Medicine, Incheon Sejong Hospital, Korea.
Rae Woong ParkDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Ajou University School of Medicine, Korea.
Inwhee ParkDepartment of Nephrology, Ajou University School of Medicine, Korea.
Ajou University · KRDong-A University · KRKorea Institute of Radiological and Medical Sciences · KRSejong General Hospital · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective Contrast agents used for radiological examinations are an important cause of acute kidney injury (AKI). We developed and validated a machine learning and clinical scoring prediction model to stratify the risk of contrast-induced nephropathy, considering the limitations of current classical and machine learning models. Methods This retrospective study included 38,481 percutaneous coronary intervention cases from 23,703 patients in a tertiary hospital. We divided the cases into development and internal test sets (8:2). Using the development set, we trained a gradient boosting machine prediction model (complex model). We then developed a simple model using seven variables based on variable importance. We validated the performance of the models using an internal test set and tested them externally in two other hospitals. Results The complex model had the best area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curve at 0.885 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.876-0.894] in the internal test set and 0.837 (95% CI 0.819-0.854) and 0.850 (95% CI 0.781-0.918) in two different external validation sets. The simple model showed an AUROC of 0.795 (95% CI 0.781-0.808) in the internal test set and 0.766 (95% CI 0.744-0.789) and 0.782 (95% CI 0.687-0.877) in the two different external validation sets. This was higher than the value in the well-known scoring system (Mehran criteria, AUROC=0.67). The seven precatheterization variables selected for the simple model were age, known chronic kidney disease, hematocrit, troponin I, blood urea nitrogen, base excess, and N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide. The simple model is available at http://52.78.230.235:8081/Conclusions We developed an AKI prediction machine learning model with reliable performance. This can aid in bedside clinical decision making.

Indexed as

Acute Kidney InjuryClinical Decision-MakingHumansMachine LearningRetrospective StudiesRisk Assessmentacute kidney injuryclinical decision makingcontrast-induced nephropathymachine learningpercutaneous coronary interventionrisk assessment

Identifiers

PMID37558487
PMCPMC11008999
OpenAlexW4385654687

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.