Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37558449›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2023

Initial effect of high-volume mobilisation with movement on shoulder range of motion and pain in patients with rotator cuff-related shoulder pain: protocol for a randomised controlled trial (Evolution Trial).

Sizhong Wang, Jiaxu Zeng, Cathy M Chapple, Ramakrishnan Mani, Daniel C Ribeiro

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sizhong WangCentre for Health, Activity and Rehabilitation Research (CHARR) - School of Physiotherapy, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0002-9274-3447
Jiaxu ZengPreventive and Social Medicine, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.
Cathy M ChappleCentre for Health, Activity and Rehabilitation Research (CHARR) - School of Physiotherapy, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.
Ramakrishnan ManiCentre for Health, Activity and Rehabilitation Research (CHARR) - School of Physiotherapy, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.
Daniel C RibeiroCentre for Health, Activity and Rehabilitation Research (CHARR) - School of Physiotherapy, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand daniel.ribeiro@otago.ac.nz.ORCID 0000-0001-9287-9187
University of Otago · NZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionMobilisation with movement (MWM) is commonly used for treating patients with rotator cuff-related shoulder pain (RCRSP). However, the evidence supporting MWM efficacy for improving shoulder range of motion (ROM) and pain in patients with RCRSP is limited. It is also unclear whether higher volume MWM leads to better clinical outcomes compared with lower volume MWM in patients with RCRSP. The primary aim of this study is to assess the effect of MWM on the angular onset of pain during shoulder abduction in patients with RCRSP. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Sixty participants with RCRSP will be randomised to receive either MWM or sham MWM intervention. The primary outcome is the angular onset of pain during shoulder abduction, and secondary outcomes are pain intensity at the angular onset of pain during shoulder abduction, maximum shoulder ROM, pain intensity during maximum shoulder abduction, pressure pain threshold, mechanical temporal summation, global rating of change scale (GROC) and Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-SF). The angular onset of pain and the pain intensity at that range will be assessed at baseline, after 1 set and 3 sets of 10 repetitions of MWM or sham MWM. The GROC will be measured immediately after receiving 3 sets of interventions and on day 3 after interventions. The BPI-SF will be measured on days 1, 3, 5 and 7 after interventions. Other secondary outcomes will be assessed at baseline and after 3 sets of interventions. A linear mixed effects model with a random intercept will be used to compare changes in the outcome measures between MWM and sham MWM interventions. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study has been approved by the University of Otago Ethics Committee (Ref. H21/117). Findings from this study will be disseminated through presentations at international and national conferences and will be submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed journal. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ACTRN 12621001723875.

Indexed as

Rotator CuffShoulderHumansPhysical Therapy ModalitiesRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRange of Motion, ArticularShoulder Painclinical trialsrehabilitation medicineshoulder

Identifiers

PMID37558449
PMCPMC10414061
OpenAlexW4385700208

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.