ArticleBMJ open ophthalmology2023
Implementing strabismus-specific psychosocial questionnaires in everyday clinical practice: mental health and quality of life in the context of strabismus surgery.
Article in BMJ open ophthalmology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- The impact of surgical intervention on the psychosocial health and quality of life of children with strabismus.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- The effect of strabismus surgery on the quality of life in children and adolescents.BMC ophthalmology · 2025Article
- Strabismic Adults' Expectations of Psychosocial Support From Healthcare Professionals-A Qualitative Descriptive Study.Health science reports · 2025Article
- Concurrent adjacent strabismus surgery with glaucoma drainage device placement in childhood glaucomas.BMC ophthalmology · 2024Article
- Strabismic Adults' Experiences of Psychosocial Influence of Strabismus-A Qualitative Study.SAGE open nursingArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundStrabismus can have a great negative impact on the quality of life and the well-being of affected patients. In the past, these aspects were often neglected and, compared with somatic functioning, placed in the background. The aim of our study is to elicit factors influencing satisfaction with strabismus surgery, quality of life and expectations of surgery in order to better predict who will benefit the most and who may need further support.
methodsWe made a selection of suitable questionnaires to assess psychosocial aspects of strabismus and decided for Adult Strabismus 20 Questionnaire, Amblyopia and Strabismus Questionnaire, Diplopia Questionnaire, Expectations of Strabismus Surgery Questionnaire and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. We then translated these measures (if not available in German). The patients filled out these forms as part of their preoperative orthoptic and ophthalmological assessment as well as approximately 3 months after strabismus surgery.
resultsWe enrolled 59 patients in this study. Postoperative strabismus-related quality of life was higher after surgery and anxiety and depression levels were lower. Satisfaction with surgery was lower with higher postoperative angle and diplopia; the latter was also a determinant of lower postoperative quality of life. Higher expectations of strabismus surgery were present with higher depression levels and higher preoperative strabismus angle.
conclusionOur data indicate that strabismus surgery may cause a significant improvement in several psychosocial domains. There is evidence that psychosocial factors can have significant impact on expectations with surgery. Hence, it is important to consider mental health aspects of this disease in order to treat patients in the best possible way.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.