ReviewBMJ open ophthalmology2023
Fairness and generalisability in deep learning of retinopathy of prematurity screening algorithms: a literature review.
Review in BMJ open ophthalmology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Algorithm's Blindspot: An Ethical Critique of Data-Fetishism and the Deskilling of the Clinical Gaze in Ophthalmology.Journal of bioethical inquiry · 2026Article
- Systematic review and meta-analysis of risk prediction models for retinopathy of prematurity in preterm infants.Biomedical reports · 2025Article
- Transforming neonatal care through informatics: A review of artificial intelligence, data, and implementation considerations.Seminars in perinatology · 2025Review
- Artificial Intelligence Applications in Ophthalmology.JMA journal · 2025Review
- Body Surface Potential Mapping: A Perspective on High-Density Cutaneous Electrophysiology.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025Review
- Retinopathy of prematurity: Accuracy of ROPScore and WINROP algorithms in a Brazilian population.Arquivos brasileiros de oftalmologia · 2025Article
- BRSET: A Brazilian Multilabel Ophthalmological Dataset of Retina Fundus Photos.PLOS digital health · 2024Article
- BRSET: A Brazilian Multilabel Ophthalmological Dataset of Retina Fundus Photos.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 8 institutions in 6 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRetinopathy of prematurity (ROP) is a vasoproliferative disease responsible for more than 30 000 blind children worldwide. Its diagnosis and treatment are challenging due to the lack of specialists, divergent diagnostic concordance and variation in classification standards. While artificial intelligence (AI) can address the shortage of professionals and provide more cost-effective management, its development needs fairness, generalisability and bias controls prior to deployment to avoid producing harmful unpredictable results. This review aims to compare AI and ROP study's characteristics, fairness and generalisability efforts.
methodsOur review yielded 220 articles, of which 18 were included after full-text assessment. The articles were classified into ROP severity grading, plus detection, detecting treatment requiring, ROP prediction and detection of retinal zones.
resultsAll the article's authors and included patients are from middle-income and high-income countries, with no low-income countries, South America, Australia and Africa Continents representation.Code is available in two articles and in one on request, while data are not available in any article. 88.9% of the studies use the same retinal camera. In two articles, patients' sex was described, but none applied a bias control in their models.
conclusionThe reviewed articles included 180 228 images and reported good metrics, but fairness, generalisability and bias control remained limited. Reproducibility is also a critical limitation, with few articles sharing codes and none sharing data. Fair and generalisable ROP and AI studies are needed that include diverse datasets, data and code sharing, collaborative research, and bias control to avoid unpredictable and harmful deployments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.