Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37558270›Full record

ArticleBMJ global health2023

Medical device regulation and oversight in African countries: a scoping review of literature and development of a conceptual framework.

Naima Nasir, Sassy Molyneux, Fred Were, Adeniyi Aderoba, Sebastian S Fuller

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ global health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Naima NasirHealth Systems Collaborative, Center for Global Health Research, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK naima.nasir@ndm.ox.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0001-6817-9447
Sassy MolyneuxHealth Systems Collaborative, Center for Global Health Research, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Fred WereDepartment of Paediatrics and Child Health, University of Nairobi, Nairobi, Kenya.
Adeniyi AderobaReproductive, Maternal Health, and Healthy Ageing Unit, Universal Health Coverage-Life Course Cluster, World Health Organization Regional Office for Africa, Brazzaville, Democratic Republic of Congo.
Sebastian S FullerHealth Systems Collaborative, Center for Global Health Research, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

Funding

Department of HealthWorld Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Regulatory and other governance arrangements influence the introduction of medical devices into health systems and are essential for ensuring their effective and safe use. Challenges with medical device safety, quality and use are documented globally, with evidence suggesting these are linked to poor governance. Yet, medical device regulation and oversight remain inadequately defined and described, particularly in low-income and middle-income settings. Through this review, we sought to examine the literature available on regulatory and oversight processes for medical devices in African countries.Following a systematic approach, we searched academic databases including PubMed, Embase (Ovid) and MEDLINE (Ovid), supplemented by search for grey literature and relevant organisational websites, for documents describing medical device regulation and oversight in African countries. We summarised the data to present key actors, areas for regulation and oversight and challenges.A total of 39 documents reporting regulation and oversight of medical devices were included for analysis. Regulatory and oversight guidelines and processes were reported as inadequate, including limited pre-market testing, reliance on international certifications and limited processes for post-market monitoring and reporting of adverse events. Challenges for regulation and oversight reported included inadequate funding, personnel and technical expertise to perform regulatory functions. The literature highlighted gaps in guidelines for donated medical devices and in information on governance processes at the national level.The current literature provides a general overview of medical device regulatory guidelines and limited evidence on the implementation of regulatory/oversight processes at national and especially subnational levels. We recommend further research to elucidate existing governance arrangements for medical devices within African countries and propose a conceptual framework to inform future studies. The framework provides entry points for careful examination of governance and oversight in policy and practice, the exploration of governance realities across the health system and the influence of wider system dynamics.

Indexed as

Medical Device LegislationAfricaHumansHealth systemsReview

Identifiers

PMID37558270
PMCPMC10414093

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.