Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37557920›Full record

ArticleOphthalmology2024

Increases in Medicare Spending and Use after Private Equity Acquisition of Retina Practices.

Yashaswini Singh, Christopher M Aderman, Zirui Song, Daniel Polsky, Jane M Zhu

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ophthalmology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
14.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Yashaswini SinghDepartment of Health Services, Policy, and Practice, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, Rhode Island.
Christopher M AdermanEyeHealth Northwest, Portland, Oregon.
Zirui SongDepartment of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, and Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Daniel PolskyDepartment of Health Services, Policy, and Practice, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, Rhode Island; Carey Business School, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland.
Jane M ZhuDivision of General Internal Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon. Electronic address: zhujan@ohsu.edu.
Brown University · USHarvard University · USJohns Hopkins University · USOregon Health & Science University · US

Funding

Tradeoffs in the Design of Public Long-Term Care BenefitsP01AG032952 · NIA · HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI Bruce E. Landon · 2009 to 2026
$39.0M
Inequities in Health Outcomes in the Twenty-First Century: Understanding New Causes and the Impact of Delivery System Reforms on Health Care DisparitiesDP5OD024564 · OD · HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI SONG, ZIRUI · 2017 to 2021
$2.1M
Mental Health Provider Networks in Medicaid and Implications for Care Utilization and Health OutcomesK08MH123624 · NIMH · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI ZHU, JANE MINGJIA · 2020 to 2023
$756k
AHRQ HHS R01 HS029467NIA NIH HHS P01 AG032952NIH HHS DP5 OD024564NIMH NIH HHS K08 MH123624
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposePrivate equity (PE) firms increasingly are acquiring physician practices in the United States, particularly within procedural-based specialties such as ophthalmology including retina. To date, the potential impact of ophthalmology practice acquisitions remains unknown. We evaluated the association between PE acquisition and Medicare spending and use for common retina services.

designRetrospective difference-in-differences analysis using the 20% Medicare fee-for-service claims dataset from January 1, 2015, through December 31, 2019.

participantsEighty-two practices acquired by PE during the study period and matched control practices.

methodsWe used novel data on PE acquisitions of retina practices linked to the 20% sample Medicare claims data. Retina practices acquired by PE between 2016 and 2019 were matched to up to 3 non-PE (control) practices based on characteristics before acquisition. Private equity-acquired practices were compared with matched control practices through 6 quarters after acquisition using a difference-in-differences event study design. Data analyses were performed between August 2022 and April 2023.

main outcome measuresMedicare spending and use of common retina services.

resultsRelative to control practices, PE-acquired retina practices increased the use of higher-priced anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) agents including aflibercept, which differentially increased by 6.5 injections (95% confidence interval, 0.4-12.5; P = 0.03) per practice-quarter, or 22% from baseline. As a result, Medicare spending on aflibercept differentially increased by $13 028 per practice-quarter, or 21%. No statistically significant differences were found in use or spending for evaluation and management visits or diagnostic imaging.

conclusionsPrivate equity acquisition of retina practices are associated with modest increases in the use of higher-priced anti-VEGF drugs like aflibercept, leading to higher Medicare spending. This finding highlights the need to monitor the influence of PE firms' financial incentives over clinician decision-making and the appropriateness of care, which could be swayed by strong economic incentives. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

Indexed as

Health ExpendituresMedicareAgedFee-for-Service PlansHumansRetinaRetrospective StudiesUnited StatesHealth servicesMedicarePrivate equityRetinaSpending

Identifiers

PMID37557920
PMCPMC12834666
OpenAlexW4385633619

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.