ArticleJournal of proteome research2023
Real-Time Spectral Library Matching for Sample Multiplexed Quantitative Proteomics.
Article in Journal of proteome research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Single-Cell Proteomics of Human Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells Exceeding 600 Cells per Day.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Real-Time Instrument Control across Multiple Orbitrap Platforms through a Single Software Interface.Journal of proteome research · 2025Article
- Nova: A Library for Rapid Development of Mass Spectrometry Software Applications.Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry · 2025Article
- Comet Fragment-Ion Indexing for Enhanced Peptide Sequencing.Journal of proteome research · 2025Article
- Autonomous Dissociation-type Selection for Glycoproteomics Using a Real-Time Library Search.Journal of proteome research · 2024Article
- Instrumentation at the Leading Edge of Proteomics.Analytical chemistry · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Sample multiplexed quantitative proteomics assays have proved to be a highly versatile means to assay molecular phenotypes. Yet, stochastic precursor selection and precursor coisolation can dramatically reduce the efficiency of data acquisition and quantitative accuracy. To address this, intelligent data acquisition (IDA) strategies have recently been developed to improve instrument efficiency and quantitative accuracy for both discovery and targeted methods. Toward this end, we sought to develop and implement a new real-time spectral library searching (RTLS) workflow that could enable intelligent scan triggering and peak selection within milliseconds of scan acquisition. To ensure ease of use and general applicability, we built an application to read in diverse spectral libraries and file types from both empirical and predicted spectral libraries. We demonstrate that RTLS methods enable improved quantitation of multiplexed samples, particularly with consideration for quantitation from chimeric fragment spectra. We used RTLS to profile proteome responses to small molecule perturbations and were able to quantify up to 15% more significantly regulated proteins in half the gradient time compared to traditional methods. Taken together, the development of RTLS expands the IDA toolbox to improve instrument efficiency and quantitative accuracy for sample multiplexed analyses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.