Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37557172›Full record

ArticleCurrent biology : CB2023

The fate of sex chromosomes during the evolution of monoicy from dioicy in liverworts.

Shilpi Singh, Kevin M Davies, David Chagné, John L Bowman

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Current biology : CB, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
14.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Sex chromosome evolution in haploid plants: Microchromosomes, disappearing chromosomes, and giant chromosomes.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. The monoicous secondarily aquatic liverwortFrontiers in plant science · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Shilpi SinghSchool of Biological Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC 3800, Australia.
Kevin M DaviesThe New Zealand Institute for Plant and Food Research Limited, Private Bag 11600, Palmerston North 4442, New Zealand.
David ChagnéThe New Zealand Institute for Plant and Food Research Limited, Private Bag 11600, Palmerston North 4442, New Zealand.
John L BowmanSchool of Biological Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC 3800, Australia; ARC Centre of Excellence for Plant Success in Nature and Agriculture, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC 3800, Australia. Electronic address: john.bowman@monash.edu.
Plant & Food Research · NZARC Centre of Excellence for Plant Success in Nature and Agriculture · AUMonash University · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Liverworts comprise one of six primary land plant lineages, with the predicted origin of extant liverwort diversity dating to the Silurian. The ancestral liverwort has been inferred to have been dioicous (unisexual) with chromosomal sex determination in which the U chromosome of females and the V chromosome of males were dimorphic with an extensive non-recombining region. In liverworts, sex is determined by a U chromosomal "feminizer" gene that promotes female development, and in its absence, male development ensues. Monoicy (bisexuality) has independently evolved multiple times within liverworts. Here, we explore the evolution of monoicy, focusing on the monoicous species Ricciocarpos natans, and propose that the evolution of monoicy in R. natans involved the appearance of an aneuploid spore that possessed both U and V chromosomes. Chromosomal rearrangements involving the U chromosome resulted in distribution of essential U chromosome genes, including the feminizer, to several autosomal locations. By contrast, we infer that the ancestral V chromosome was inherited largely intact, probably because it carries numerous dispersed "motility" genes distributed across the chromosome. The genetic networks for sex differentiation in R. natans appear largely unchanged except that the feminizer is developmentally regulated, allowing for temporally separated differentiation of female and male reproductive organs on a single plant. A survey of other monoicous liverworts suggests that similar genomic rearrangements may have occurred repeatedly in lineages transitioning to monoicy from dioicy. These data provide a foundation for understanding how genetic networks controlling sex determination can be subtly rewired to produce profound changes in sexual systems.

Indexed as

HepatophytaEvolution, MolecularPlantsSex ChromosomesdioicousliverwortmonoicousRicciocarpos natanssex chromosome evolutionsexual systemU chromosomeV chromosome

Identifiers

PMID37557172
OpenAlexW4385666675

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.